Dismissed¶32

Sri Nanda Kishore v. Smt Shilpa Kishore

Karnataka HC2 Feb 2026MFA/5712/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution: High Court of Karnataka (Division Bench: Jayant Banerji & T.M. Nadaf JJ.), 02.02.2026, dismissed MFA No. 5712 of 2018 (FC) filed under S.19(1) Family Court Act against the judgment and decree dated 22.02.2018 of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru, in MC No.1651/2014 allowing a petition under S.9 Hindu Marriage Act; appellant's counsel had no instructions, prior double call-out with no appearance, repeated adjournments at counsel's request; adjournment declined and appeal dismissed; no merits adjudicated, no amounts or costs stated.

What did the court decide?

The request for adjournment is declined. ¶31

Sri Nanda Kishore Vs Smt Shilpa Kishore — Matrimonial and Divorce | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:5657-DB MFA No. 5712 of 2018

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

¶8

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5712 OF 2018 (FC)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. NANDA KISHORE @ HRITHVIK RAJ KISHOORE, S/O LATE PREM SHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO.24, BAJRANGNAGAR COLONY, RISALA BAZAR, BUTTON ROAD, BOLLARAUM, SECUNDERABAD - 560 010.

¶11

Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

(BY SRI. S.ISMAIL ZABIULLA., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

SMT.SHILPA KISHORE, W/O NANDA KISHORE @ HRITHVIK RAJ KISHOORE, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NO.1261, BELAKU, 32^ND CROSS, 29^TH MAIN, 4^TH ‘T’ BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 041.

¶15

…APPELLANT

¶16

…RESPONDENT

¶17

[BY SRI.SARAVANA.S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:5657-DB MFA No. 5712 of 2018

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.19(1) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.02.2018 PASSED IN MC NO.1651/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.9 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.

¶22

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

¶24

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶25

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)

¶26

Learned counsel for the appellant states that he has no instructions from the party.

¶27

The case is listed today for dismissal. When the matter was last listed, despite the matter being called out twice, no one appeared. Hence, the case was directed to be listed for dismissal. It is evident from perusal of the previous two orders that the case is being adjourned on the request of the learned counsel for the appellant.

¶28

¶29

NC: 2026:KHC:5657-DB MFA No. 5712 of 2018

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31