Sri Basavanna M C v. Sri Puttiraiah

Karnataka HC17 Jul 2026MFA/5691/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Bengaluru; MFA No. 5691 of 2024 (MV-D); CNR KAHC010490822024; Judge Shivashankar Amarannavar; decided 17-07-2026; Basavanna M C v. Puttiraiah and Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd.; Section 173(1) MV Act; enhancement of motor accident compensation; MVC No.840/2020; IV Additional District Judge & MACT Mysuru; award dated 27.01.2022; duplicate appeals filed mistakenly; memo for withdrawal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; no quantum stated; no precedent cited or laid down — cite only to document the fact of withdrawal/duplicate filing, not for any proposition of law.

What did the court decide?

Appeal permitted to be withdrawn pursuant to counsel's memo; dismissed as withdrawn, with no substantive relief or enhancement granted. ¶36-37

Sri Basavanna M C Vs Sri Puttiraiah — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:36629 MFA No. 5691 of 2024

¶3

CNR: KAHC010490822024

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No. 5691 OF 2024

¶8

(MV-D)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI BASAVANNA M C S/O CHNNAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT MOSAMBAYANAHALLI VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK & DISTRICT-570 010.

¶11

…APPELLANT

¶12

(BY SRI GIREESHA S N, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

SRI PUTTIRAIAH S/O CHIKKEERAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT AMBEDKAR BEEDHI DEBURU VILLAGE AND POST NANJANGUD TALUK-571 301. MYSURU DISTRICT.

¶16

THE TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, 1^ST FLOOR, SUNNY CENTRE No.374, NEW KALIDASA ROAD VIJAYANAGARA 1 STAGE

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:36629 MFA No. 5691 of 2024

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

CNR: KAHC010490822024

¶21

MYSURU-570 017. REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SRI S V HEGDE MULKHAND, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶24

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:27.01.2022 PASSED IN MVC No.840/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND MACT, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶25

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

¶27

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶28

Learned counsel for the appellant files memo seeking

¶29

withdrawal of the appeal.

¶30

2. The memo reads thus:

¶31

“The counsel for appellant respectfully prays that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to permit the withdraw the above appeal, since 2 appeals have been file mistakenly for one judgment and award passed by the IV Additional, District & Sessions Judge & MACT, Mysuru in MVC No.840/2020 dated 27.01.2022, in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶32

NC: 2026:KHC:36629 MFA No. 5691 of 2024

¶33

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

CNR: KAHC010490822024

¶36