Dismissed¶107

Sri Sadananda Hegde v. Sri a R Nazeer Ahmed

Karnataka HC22 Jun 2026MFA/5318/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Infructuous appeal; dismissal of MFA for want of surviving relief; Karnataka High Court at Bengaluru; NC: 2026:KHC:30945; MFA No. 962/2016 c/w MFA Nos. 5318, 6576, 6577 and 7216 of 2016; Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC appeals against refusal of temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC (and Order XXXIX Rule 4 vacate orders); original suits disposed of on 20.02.2023; duty of advocates/counsel to promptly inform the Court of subsequent developments; Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur; decided 22 June 2026; respondents A.R. Nazeer Ahmed and M/s Nanjundeshwara Developers.

What did the court decide?

The miscellaneous first appeals are dismissed. ¶107

Sri Sadananda Hegde Vs Sri a R Nazeer Ahmed — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:30945 MFA No. 962 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 5318 of 2016 MFA No. 6576 of 2016 AND 2 OTHERS

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 22^ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 962 OF 2016 (CPC) C/W

¶8

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5318 OF 2016 MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6576 OF 2016 MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6577 OF 2016 MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7216 OF 2016

¶9

IN MFA No. 962/2016

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

SRI. SINGAMANENI CHALAPATHY AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, S/O. SRI. S. CHANDRAPPA, NO.B-004, ADARSH RHYTHAM APARTMENTS, NO.71, PANDURANGA NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 076.

¶13

(BY MRS. PREETHI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR

¶14

SRI. ABHINAV R., ADVOCATE)

¶15

…APPELLANT

¶16

AND:

¶17

SRI. A. R. NAZEER AHMED

¶18

AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O. A.N. BASHA, NO.88A, GRIHALAKSHMI EXTENSION,

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:30945 MFA No. 962 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 5318 of 2016 MFA No. 6576 of 2016 AND 2 OTHERS

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 079.

¶23

M/S. NANJUNDESHWARA DEVELOPERS

¶24

A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.659, 2^ND PHASE, BANASHANKARI 3^RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085,

¶25

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI. R.V. SUBRAMANYA.

¶26

…RESPONDENTS

¶27

(BY SRI. M.S. VARADARAJAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)

¶28

THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED: 30.11.2015 PASSED ON IA NO.I IN O.S NO.2325/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, REJECTING IA NO.1 FILED U/O 39 RULE 1 AND 2 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC.

¶29

IN MFA NO. 5318/2016

¶30

BETWEEN:

¶31

SRI SADANANDA HEGDE AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS S/O SRI.NARAYANA HEGDE, NO.60, 1ST MAIN, IDEAD HOMES,

¶32

¶33

NC: 2026:KHC:30945 MFA No. 962 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 5318 of 2016 MFA No. 6576 of 2016 AND 2 OTHERS

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

R.R.NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 098.

¶36

...APPELLANT

¶37

(BY MRS. PREETHI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR

¶38

SRI. ABHINAV R., ADVOCATE)

¶39

AND:

¶40

SRI A. R. NAZEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O A.N.BHASHA, NO.88A, GRIHALAKSHMI EXTENSION, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 079.

¶41

M/S NANJUNDESHWARA DEVELOPERS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM,

¶42

HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.659, 2^ND PHASE, BANASHANKARI 3^RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085

¶43

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI.R.V.SUBRAMANYA

¶44

...RESPONDENTS

¶45

(BY SRI. M S VARADARAJAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶46

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, 1908 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.01.2016 PASSED ON I.A. NO.1 IN O.S.NO. 2154/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE XVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, (C.C.H.16), DISMISSING I.A. NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 & 2 CPC.

¶47

¶48

NC: 2026:KHC:30945 MFA No. 962 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 5318 of 2016 MFA No. 6576 of 2016 AND 2 OTHERS

¶49

HC-KAR

¶50

IN MFA NO. 6576/2016

¶51

BETWEEN:

¶52

SRI H. N. VIDYASHANKAR AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O SRI.H.K.NANJUNDA SWAMY NO.3994/F, 17^TH 'D' CROSS, 4^TH MAIN, BSK 2^ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 070.

¶53

...APPELLANT

¶54

(BY MRS. PREETHI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ABHINAV R., ADVOCATE)

¶55

AND:

¶56

SRI A. R. NAZEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O A.N. BHASHA, NO.88A, GRIHALAKSHMI EXTENSION, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 079.

¶57

M/S. NANJUNDESHWARA DEVELOPERS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.659, 2^ND PHASE, BANASHANKARI 3^RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI.R.V. SUBRAMANYA

¶58

...RESPONDENTS

¶59

(BY SRI. M. S. VARADARAJAN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2)

¶60

¶61

NC: 2026:KHC:30945 MFA No. 962 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 5318 of 2016 MFA No. 6576 of 2016 AND 2 OTHERS

¶62

HC-KAR

¶63

THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED: 01.07.2016 PASSED ON IA NO.1 & IA NO.4 IN O.S.NO.3013/15 ON THE FILE OF THE 14TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING IA NO.1 FILED U/O.39 RULE 1&2 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC, ALLOWING IA NO.4 FILED U/O.39 RULE 4 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC.

¶64

IN MFA NO. 6577/2016

¶65

BETWEEN:

¶66

SMT. PARIMALA P. JOSHI AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, W/O SRI PRAMOD N. JOSHI R/O NO.206B-25, RICHGROVE DRIVE, TORONTO M9R OA3, CANADA REPRESENTED BY HER GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SRI.VAMAN B PATIL

¶67

...APPELLANT

¶68

(BY MRS. PREETHI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR

¶69

SRI. ABHINAV R., ADVOCATE)

¶70

AND:

¶71

SRI A. R. NAZEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O A.N.BASHA

¶72

¶73

NC: 2026:KHC:30945 MFA No. 962 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 5318 of 2016 MFA No. 6576 of 2016 AND 2 OTHERS

¶74

HC-KAR

¶75

NO.88A, GRIHALAKSHMI EXTENSION, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 079

¶76

M/S NANJUNDESHWARA DEVELOPERS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.659, 2^ND PHASE, BANASHANKARI 3^RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI.R.V.SUBRAMANYA

¶77

...RESPONDENTS

¶78

(BY SRI. M. S. VARADARAJAN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2)

¶79

THIS MFA IS FILED U/O. 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 01.07.2016 PASSED ON IA NO.1 & IA NO.4 IN O.S.NO.2260/15 ON THE FILE OF THE 14TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING IA NO.1 FILED U/O.39 RULE 1&2 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC, ALLOWING IA NO.4 FILED U/O.39 RULE 4 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC.

¶80

IN MFA NO. 7216/2016

¶81

BETWEEN:

¶82

SMT N. G. SRILAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS W/O SRI. A.N. NATARAJA, NO.1652, 9^TH MAIN ROAD, "A" BLOCK, 2^ND STAGE,

¶83

¶84

NC: 2026:KHC:30945 MFA No. 962 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 5318 of 2016 MFA No. 6576 of 2016 AND 2 OTHERS

¶85

HC-KAR

¶86

RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010.

¶87

...APPELLANT

¶88

(BY MRS. PREETHI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ABHINAV R., ADVOCATE)

¶89

AND:

¶90

SRI A. R. NAZEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O A.N. BASHA, NO.88A, GRIHALAKSHMI EXTENSION, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 079.

¶91

M/S NANJUNDESHWARA DEVELOPERS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.659, 2^ND PHASE, BANASHANKARI 3^RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085, REPARESENTD BY ITS MANAGING PAWRTNER SRI.R.V. SUBRAMANYA

¶92

...RESPONDENTS

¶93

(BY SRI. M. S. VARADARAJAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶94

THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED: 14.01.2016 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN OS.NO.2413/15 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING IA NO.1 FILED U/O.39 RULE 1&2 OF CPC.

¶95

8 - NC: 2026:KHC:30945 MFA No. 962 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 5318 of 2016 MFA No. 6576 of 2016 AND 2 OTHERS

¶96

HC-KAR

¶97

THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS

¶98

DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶99

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶100

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶101

Learned counsel for the appellants is present.

¶102

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that

¶103

the original suit before the trial Court was disposed of on 20.02.2023. This Court fails to understand why this was not informed to the Court. Learned counsels are responsible officers of the Court in the process of administration of justice and part of the judicial system and they owe a duty and responsibility to inform the Court at the earliest time to avoid any inconvenience and unnecessary expenditures to the state exchequer.

¶104

NC: 2026:KHC:30945 MFA No. 962 of 2016 C/W MFA No. 5318 of 2016 MFA No. 6576 of 2016 AND 2 OTHERS

¶105

¶106

HC-KAR

¶107

Nevertheless, the appeals are dismissed , taking note of

¶108

the submission of learned counsel for the appellants, as

¶109

having become infructuous.

¶110