Dismissed¶¶32

Smt.Roopa v. Smt.Ammayya

Karnataka HC9 Jul 2026MFA/4750/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of appeal; Sec.115 CPC revision; Review Petition No.1/2025; Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Channarayapatna; subject value Rs.10,00,000/-; liberty to seek alternative remedy; condonation of time spent; return of certified copies; Hassan District parties (Roopa, Omkar, Vaibhav v. Ammayya, Jayalakshmi); Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur; 9 July 2026; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to the appellants to seek appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum; time spent herein to be condoned if fresh proceedings are filed; certified copies of relevant documents to be returned to counsel for the appellants. ¶¶32

Smt.Roopa Vs Smt.Ammayya — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:34861 MFA No. 4750 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4750 OF 2026 (CPC) BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT.ROOPA W/O LATE P.M.GOPINATH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

¶8

SRI. OMKAR, S/O LATE P.M.GOPINATH, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS.

¶9

MR. VAIBHAV, S/O LATE P.M. GOPINATH, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS.

¶10

Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

APPELLANT NO.2 AND 3 BEING MINORS R/BY THEIR MOTHER PETITIONER NO.1 ALL ARE R/O NO. 99, 1ST MAIN ROAD, C/O SHINE MY CAR, OPPOSITE TO LIC OFFICE, NEAR PRUTHVI THEATER, HOUSING BOARD ROAD, SHANKARIPURAM, HASSAN CITY - 573 201.

¶12

…APPELLANTS

¶13

(BY SRI. KAVITHA H.C, ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

SMT. AMMAYYA W/O K. BYREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,

¶16

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:34861 MFA No. 4750 of 2026

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

R/O BASAVESHWARA NILAYA 12TH MAIN ROAD, B.G.TILAK EXTENSION, CHANNARAYAPATNA TOWN, HASSAN - 573 201.

¶20

SMT. JAYALAKSHMI, W/O P.T.MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS. R/O POOMADIHALLI VILLAGE, SHRAVANABELAGOLA HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATNATALUK, HASSAN - 573 201.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE REVISION PETITION BY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.02.2026, IN REVIEW PETITION.1/2025, ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT CHANNARAYAPATNA AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE AFORESAID REVIEW PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶23

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶25

¶26

NC: 2026:KHC:34861 MFA No. 4750 of 2026

¶27

HC-KAR

¶28

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶29

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the

¶30

subject value of the appeal is stated to be Rs.10,00,000/-. Therefore, she seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this appeal and to permit her to avail alternative remedy before the appropriate forum.

¶31

Submission is placed on record.

¶32

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is reserved to the appellants to seek appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum.

¶33

Time spent herein shall be condoned if any such proceedings are filed. Certified copies of the relevant documents shall be returned to the learned counsel for the appellants.

¶34

Registry is directed to return certified copy within two days from the date of receipt of the file.

¶35

Sd/(PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE

¶36

VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15

Smt.Roopa v. Smt.Ammayya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.Roopa v. Smt.Ammayya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shri P Radha Krishna Vs Sri Manjunath C

Sri H N Suresh Kumar Vs Sri Madappa

Sri. H. N. Suresh Kumar Vs Sri Madappa

Smt. Qunja Fatima Vs Anwar Salh

Shri Rajani Kumar Vs Sri Manjunath C

Sri. L Eshwaraiah Vs Sri B J Anjanamurthy