Fazlul Hassan Zahid v. Srikanth Seetharam
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru — MFA No. 4027 of 2025 (CPC), decided 28-07-2026 by Pradeep Singh Yerur J. (Neutral citation: NC: 2026:KHC:39492). Appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC against trial-court order dated 07.04.2025 allowing IA No.6 under Section 151 CPC in O.S.No.3390/2019 (XV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, CCH No. 3). Dismissed as not maintainable on Registry objection; liberty granted to seek appropriate relief before appropriate forum with time spent condonable; appellants were Fazlul Hassan Zahid and Prestige Public School; respondents Srikanth Seetharam and Satish Kumar; appellants' counsel Abdul Wajid S.A. No precedent discussed, no quantum awarded.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as not maintainable; liberty reserved to the appellants to move the appropriate forum for appropriate relief with time spent herein to be condoned if such proceedings are filed; certified copies of documents produced to be returned to learned counsel for the appellants.