Dismissed¶31

E S I Corporation v. M/S Sree Dhanalakshmi Engineering

Karnataka HC3 Jul 2026MFA/3357/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of MFA No. 3357 of 2020 (ESI), High Court of Karnataka, judge Pradeep Singh Yerur; appeal by Deputy Director ESIC under S.82(2) ESI Act against EIC Mysuru order dated 30.11.2019 in ESI Application No.4/2017 (partly allowing a S.75 ESI Act application); dismissed as withdrawn following settlement under ESIC Amnesty Scheme, 2025; advocates: Geetha Devi M.P. (appellant), Nataraja Ballal A. (R1).

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to the appellant to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn. ¶31

E S I Corporation Vs M/S Sree Dhanalakshmi Engineering — Insurance | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:33381 MFA No. 3357 of 2020

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3357 OF 2020 (ESI)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR E S I CORPORATION 1^ST FLOOR, ESI DISPENSARY BUILDINGS BADEMAKAN EXTENSION BANGALORE MYSORE ROAD MYSORE - 570 007

¶9

…APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI. GEETHA DEVI M.P., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

M/S SREE DHANALAKSHMI ENGINEERING REP. BY S.R. SHIVANNA, PARTNER NO.295, 22^ND CROSS D BLOCK, J P NAGAR, MYSURU

¶13

E S I CORPORATION

¶14

Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH

¶15

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶16

THE RECOVERY OFFICER NO.10, BINNY FIELD BINNYPET, BENGALURU-23

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SRI. NATARAJA BALLAL A., ADVOCATE FOR R1)

¶19

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 82(2) OF EMPLOYEE STATE INSURANCE ACT AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.11.2019 PASSED IN ESI APPLICATION NO.4/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COURT, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 75 OF ESI ACT.

¶20

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

¶22

NC: 2026:KHC:33381 MFA No. 3357 of 2020

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶25

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶26

Learned counsel for appellant files a memo seeking withdrawal of this appeal, which reads as under:

¶27

" The Appellant has filed the above Appeal against the order dated 30.11.2019 in ESI No.4/2017 on the file of ESI at Bangalore.

¶28

The Respondent has availed the benefits of resolving the dispute before the ESIC Amnesty Scheme, 2025, and the dispute has been resolved.

¶29

Wherefore the Appellant named above prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Appellant to withdraw the above appeal, in the ends of justice ."

¶30

Placing the memo on record, the appeal is

¶31

dismissed as withdrawn, as the matter is settled before

¶32

the Authorities under the ESIC Amnesty Scheme, 2025.

¶33

Sd/(PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE

¶34

PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3

E S I Corporation v. M/S Sree Dhanalakshmi Engineering

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

E S I Corporation v. M/S Sree Dhanalakshmi Engineering

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Innomac Engineering Industries Vs Mr. T. Muniswamy Reddy

Mr. Lohithkumar M Vs Mr. Ramaswamy M

Smt. C. G. Chandrakala Vs Sri. Muniraju

Sri H Sree Balaji Vs Smt Latha Choodaiah

Sri R B C Parameshwara Aradhya Since Deceased by His Lrs Vs Sri M S Malappa

Sri Venkateshappa Vs Sri G Munirathnaiah