Dismissed¶31

Sri P Sadashivam v. Sri Sandeep Nivrutti Kadam

Karnataka HC9 Jun 2026MFA/2396/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru (P Sree Sudha, J.; NC: 2026:KHC:27773), decided 09.06.2026: MFA No. 2396 of 2014 (MV-I) filed by P. Sadashivam under S. 173(1) MV Act against Sandeep Nivrutti Kadam (RC owner of lorry MH-06-K-9533) and Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. (policy no. 1108712334000183) seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by judgment and award dated 1.1.2014 in MVC No.231/2012 — dismissed for non-prosecution for want of appearance/interest of the appellant; no issue on merits decided; no precedents cited; no quantum awarded.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, as the appellant failed to evince any interest in prosecuting the appeal and no purpose would be served by keeping the matter pending. ¶31

Sri P Sadashivam Vs Sri Sandeep Nivrutti Kadam — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:27773 MFA No. 2396 of 2014

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2396 OF 2014 (MV-I)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. P. SADASHIVAM S/O PALANI SAMY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/A C/O PRABHA REDDY BUILDING, 6TH CROSS, 7TH MAIN, OM SHAKTHI LAYOUT, GAREBHAVI PALYA, BENGALURU - 560 068.

¶10

Digitally signed by PADMASHREE SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶11

PERMANENT ADDRESS: SRI. P. SADASHIVAM S/O SRI. PALANI SAMY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/A NO.1/96, 126, PANANGKADU ST, MEYANUR, SALEM - 636 004, TAMILNADU.

¶12

(BY SRI. NANAIAH N.S, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶13

…APPELLANT

¶14

AND:

¶15

SRI. SANDEEP NIVRUTTI KADAM LIG II, ROOM NO.A/43, SECTOR 2 E, KALAMBOLI, TAL,

¶16

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:27773 MFA No. 2396 of 2014

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

PANVEL DISTRICT, RAIGARH, MAHARASHTRA - 410 218. (RC OWNER OF LORRY BEARING REG NO.MH-06-K-9533)

¶20

RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. REGIONAL OFFICE, CENTENARY BUILDING, NO.28, 5TH FLOOR, M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. (POLICY NO. 1108712334000183 VALID FROM 03.05.2011 TO 02.05.2012)

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI. D. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 (ABSENT); VIDE ORDER DATED 20.03.2018, NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH)

¶23

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 1.1.2014 PASSED IN MVC NO.231/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDL. SMALL CAUSES JUDGE & XXXIX ACMM, BANGALORE PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶24

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA

¶26

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:27773 MFA No. 2396 of 2014

¶27

HC-KAR

¶28

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶29

Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. The appellant is also absent.

¶30

On 01.08.2025, the matter was listed under the caption 'For Dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant has failed to evince any interest in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, no purpose would be served by keeping the matter pending.

¶31

3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-

¶32

prosecution.

¶33

Sd/(P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE

¶34

TMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16

Sri P Sadashivam v. Sri Sandeep Nivrutti Kadam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri P Sadashivam v. Sri Sandeep Nivrutti Kadam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd Vs Smt. Jasmine

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sri Ninge Gowda

Sri. Venkatesh Vs Shafi Urrahiman Shaik

Mrs. Jyoti S Somaraddi Vs Mr. Shreedhar B Somaraddi

Smt Gowramma Vs Mr Shivaremegowda

The Branch Manager Vs Smt.Gowramma