Dismissed¶44

Sri Nagaraj P v. Sri N Gopalappa

Karnataka HC15 Jun 2026MFA/1713/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Nagaraj P v. N Gopalappa and others — High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, MFA No. 1713 of 2021 (CPC), decided 15.06.2026 by Pradeep Singh Yerur J. First appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC against trial-court order dated 16.02.2021 dismissing IA No.1 (Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 CPC) in O.S. No.6215/2020 (XV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, CCH-3). Appeal dismissed as withdrawn as infructuous on appellant's counsel's memo; no merits adjudicated, no precedent discussed, no costs or quantum recorded.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sri Nagaraj P Vs Sri N Gopalappa — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:28864 MFA No. 1713 of 2021

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1713 OF 2021 (CPC)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI NAGARAJ P

¶10

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O. LATE. PATALAPPA, R/AT NO. 38/3, RAMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE,

¶11

NEAR NAGARJUNA DEGREE COLLEGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, SINGANAYAKANAHALLI POST, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU 560064

¶12

…APPELLANT

¶13

(BY SRI. ABHINAV RAMANAND A.,ADVOCATE)

¶14

Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

AND:

¶16

SRI N GOPALAPPA S/O. LATE. NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,

¶17

SRI. MUNIRAJU G S/O. N. GOPALAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

¶18

RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 2 ARE RESDING AT R/AT NO. 38/3,

¶19

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:28864 MFA No. 1713 of 2021

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

RAMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, SN HALLI POST, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT.

¶22

SMT. AKKAYAMMA W/O. LATE. THIPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

¶23

SRI. T MANJUNATHA SWAMY @ MANJUNATHA S/O. LATE. THIPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

¶24

SRI. T. MUNIRAJA S/O. LATE. THIPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

¶25

RESPONDENT NOS.3 TO 5 ARE RESIDING AT R/AT NO. 55/7, RAMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, SN HALLI POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT.

¶26

SRI. KEMPANNA

¶27

S/O. LATE. NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

¶28

PRADEEP K S/O. KEMPANNA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

¶29

DILIP K S/O. KEMPANNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

¶30

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:28864 MFA No. 1713 of 2021

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

RESPONDENTS NO.6 TO 8 ARE R/AT NO. RAMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, SN HALLI POST, YELAHANKA , BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT.

¶33

…RESPONDENTS

¶34

(BY SRI. BABU M., AND SRI.N.R JAYAPRAKASH ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R8)

¶35

THIS MFA IS FILED U/O. 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED. 16.02.2021, PASSED ON IA NO.1, IN O.S. NO.6215/2020, ON THE FILE OF THE XV-ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-3), DISMISSING THE IA NO.1 FILED U/O.39 RULES 1 AND 2 R/W. SEC.151 OF CPC.

¶36

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶37

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶38

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶39

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that in view of subsequent developments, the present appeal has become infructuous and nothing survives for consideration.

¶40