Dismissed¶¶29

Mr Srikrishna Chandrashekar v. Mrs Manohita Gurram

Karnataka HC11 Feb 2026MFA/14/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC 2026; MFA No. 14 of 2026 (GW); withdrawal of miscellaneous first appeal; Order 43 Rule 1 CPC; Section 12 Guardian and Wards Act; I.A.No.9; G and WC No.80/2025; Principal Judge Family Court Bengaluru; order dated 24.11.2025 rejecting IA No.9; dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to challenge impugned order through proper jurisdictional channel; Jayant Banerji; T.M. Nadaf.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; liberty left open to the appellant to pursue her remedy by challenging the impugned order through the proper jurisdictional channel. ¶¶29

Mr Srikrishna Chandrashekar Vs Mrs Manohita Gurram — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:8233-DB MFA No. 14 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 11^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI

¶8

AND

¶9

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2026 (GW)

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

MR. SRIKRISHNA CHANDRASHEKAR, S/O LATE K. CHANDRASEKARAN, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.101, NILADRI APARTMENTS, PLOT NO.6, SRI.VIJAYRAJ ESTATE, CHOKKANAHALLI, OPPOSITE TO VAJRAM NEWTOWN MAIN GATE, BENGALURU - 560 064, PHONE NO. : 97310 66550, EMAIL: [email protected]

¶12

…APPELLANT

¶13

(BY MS. AKSHATA SHARMA, ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

Digitally Signed by REKHA R Location : High Court of Karnataka

¶16

MRS. MANOHITA GURRAM, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT: CS 4142, SOBHA CITY, CASA SERINITA, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077. PHONE NO.: 97318 36800 EMAIL: [email protected]

¶17

…RESPONDENT

¶18

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED: 24.11.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO.9 IN G AND WC NO.80/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, REJECTING THE I.A.NO 9 PETITION FILED U/S.12 OF THE GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT.

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:8233-DB MFA No. 14 of 2026

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI

¶24

and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

¶25

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶26

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)

¶27

A memo for withdrawal is on record. Liberty has been

¶28

sought to challenge the impugned order through the proper jurisdictional channel.

¶29

The learned counsel for the appellant states that a petition has already been filed before the Court of competent jurisdiction. This appeal is therefore dismissed

¶30

as withdrawn , leaving it open to the appellant to pursue her remedy.

¶31

Sd/(JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE

¶32

Sd/(T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

¶33

PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31 ct-vn

Mr Srikrishna Chandrashekar v. Mrs Manohita Gurram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Srikrishna Chandrashekar v. Mrs Manohita Gurram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kathyayini (Divyashri) K. P. Vs Sri. Mallikarjunakalmata G M

Harish C M Vs Smt Lavanya Harish C M

Sri. Jeevan C M Vs Smt. Keerthini H U

Mrs Vidya Vs Rajesh Suvarna

Mr. D Shivakumar Vs Mrs. Pallavi B R

Sri G Nanjappa Vs Karnataka Industrial Areas