Sri Sadiq Khan v. Smt Narasamma @ Gangamma

Karnataka HC15 Jul 2026HRRP/17/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

HRRP No. 17 of 2025; Sadiq Khan v. Narasamma @ Gangamma; High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru; Justice Jyoti M; order dated 15-07-2026; House Rent Revision Petition under Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 S.115; petition disposed as not pressed; amicable settlement outside Court; signed memo by petitioner and counsel; conscious decision confirmed on query; undertaking against review or modification; pending interlocutory applications disposed; withdrawal/non-press of revision petition; Tumakuru; no substantive adjudication, no case citations, no quantum.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as not pressed at the petitioner's instance following amicable settlement outside the Court; all pending interlocutory applications, if any, likewise disposed of. ¶¶32

Sri Sadiq Khan Vs Smt Narasamma @ Gangamma — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:36052 HRRP No. 17 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M

¶8

HOUSE RENT REVISION PETITION NO. 17 OF 2025

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. SADIQ KHAN, S/O. MEHABOOB KHAN, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT JANATHA COLONY, MARALUR DINNE, TUMAKURU CITY, TUMAKURU-572105.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. ELAM PARUTTI G., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NAGARAJA S., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

SMT. NARASAMMA @ GANGAMMA, W/O. RAMACHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT JANATHA COLONY, MARALURU DINNE, TUMAKURU-572105.

¶16

…RESPONDENT

¶17

(BY SRI. NARENDRA BABU B.K., ADVOCATE)

¶18

THIS HOUSE RENT REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE OF THE KARNATAKA RENT ACT, 1999, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶19

THIS HOUSE RENT REVISION PETITION IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶20

¶21

NC: 2026:KHC:36052 HRRP No. 17 of 2025

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Sri.Elam Parutti G., counsel on behalf of Sri.Nagaraja S., for the petitioner and Sri.Narendra Babu B.K., counsel for the respondent appeared in person.

¶25

Petitioner - Sadiq Khan is physically present before the Court and he has been duly identified by his counsel Sri.Elam Parutti G.,

¶26

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that a memo has been filed which has been duly signed by the petitioner and his counsel stating that the matter has been amicably settled outside the Court, hence, the petitioner would not press the above petition. Accordingly the petition may be disposed of as not pressed.

¶27

When queried, counsel and the petitioner jointly submit that a conscious decision is taken about the disposal of the petition as not pressed and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order.

¶28

The oral submission is placed on record.

¶29

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:36052 HRRP No. 17 of 2025

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the disposal of the petition, the Writ Petition is disposed as not pressed.

¶33

Because of disposal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.

¶34