Banumustak v. Najimunnisa
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil revision petition filed against an interlocutory order in an ongoing suit was withdrawn by the petitioner through a memo on the ground that it had become infructuous.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2026:KHC:30931 CRP No. 584 of 2022
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 584 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
BANUMUSTAK W/O MUNSUK MOHAMMED, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, NO.20, D.A.R.P. QUARTERS ROAD, HASSAN-08172.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. OMKAR BASAVA PRABHU, ADVOCATE)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Banumustak W/o Munsuk Mohammed
- respondent
Najimunnisa W/o Late Bahir Khan
- respondent
Aslam Sher Khan S/o S.K. Bhasheer Khan
- respondent
Dr. Syed Sulthan R S/o Ajan Ahmed
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRP/584/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court