Disposed

Mr. Syed Rafeeq v. Smt. K. R. Satyavati

Karnataka HC18 Sept 2026CRP/351/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 CPC after the petitioners' counsel sought permission to convert it into a writ petition. The court permitted conversion within two weeks and closed all interim applications.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners permitted to convert the Civil Revision Petition into a writ petition within two weeks; all interim applications closed.

Mr. Syed Rafeeq Vs Smt. K. R. Satyavati — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:51155 CRP No. 351 of 2026

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

CNR: KAHC010241012026

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶6

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 351 OF 2026 (IO)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

MR. SYED RAFEEQ SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS

¶11

HALEEMA SADIYA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS. D/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ.

¶12

SYED SHAROOQ. AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS. S/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ.

¶13

Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

ASIYA TARANUM AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, D/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ.

¶15

ABEAD MAAZ, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, S/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ,

¶16

MRS. MUNEERA BANO. W/O LATE SYED RAFEEQ, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

¶17

ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.301, RETUL APARTMENT,

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:51155 CRP No. 351 of 2026

¶19

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

CNR: KAHC010241012026

¶22

2ND FLOOR, ARMUGAM CIRCLE, BASAVANGUDI, BENGALURU - 560 004.

¶23

…PETITIONERS

¶24

(BY SRI. M.S. MUKARRAM, ADVOCATE)

¶25

AND:

¶26

SMT. K. R. SATYAVATI W/O A. S. PATTABIRAMAN, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

¶27

SRI. A. S. PATTABIRAMAN S/O A. B. SUBRAMANYAM. AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,

¶28

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.607/A, 1ST MAIN ROAD, E BLOCK, II STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010.

¶29

…RESPONDENTS

¶30

THIS CRP IS FILED U/S. 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 09.01.2026, PASSED IN OS NO. 5254/2018 ON IA NO. 9 PASSED BY THE XXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE A AND CONSEQUENTLY BY DISMISS THE APPLICATION AND GRANT SUCH OTHER INCIDENTAL RELIEF, WHICH THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶31

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶32

NC: 2026:KHC:51155 CRP No. 351 of 2026

¶33

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

CNR: KAHC010241012026

¶36

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶37

ORAL ORDER

¶38

Office has raised the objection with regard to

¶39

maintainability.

¶40

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to convert this Civil Revision Petition into writ petition. Accordingly, the petitioners are permitted to convert this Civil Revision Petition into writ petition within a period of two weeks from today.

¶41

For all statistical purposes, the civil revision petition

¶42

is disposed of.

¶43

4. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed.

¶44

SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

¶45

BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29

Mr. Syed Rafeeq v. Smt. K. R. Satyavati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Syed Rafeeq v. Smt. K. R. Satyavati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases