Dismissed¶30

Smt. Vaishali v. Smt. M Sangeetha Ghodke

Karnataka HC16 Mar 2026CRL.RP/215/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru; CRL.RP No. 215 of 2018; decided 16.03.2026 by Hon'ble Mr. Justice V Srishananda; petitioner Smt. Vaishali W/o Santhosh Kumar (advocates Sri Bharath Y.J for Sri J.S. Halashetti); respondents LRs of deceased Smt. M Sangeetha Ghodke (advocate Sri Mahabaleshwar G.C); revision under S.397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C. against conviction dated 14.11.2016 in C.C.No.51426/2013 and its confirmation in Crl.A.No.25063/2016; petition withdrawn via memo and dismissed as withdrawn; no merits decided, no cases cited, no amounts awarded.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Criminal Revision Petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn, without adjudication on merits. ¶30

Smt. Vaishali Vs Smt. M Sangeetha Ghodke — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:15428 CRL.RP No. 215 of 2018

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 215 OF 2018

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT. VAISHALI W/O SANTHOSH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT PRAKRUTHI LAYOUT I CROSS KALYAN NAGAR HENNUR, BENGALURU - 560 043.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI BHARATH Y.J, ADV., FOR SRI J.S. HALASHETTI, ADV.)

¶10

AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

SMT. M SANGEETHA GHODKE W/O MAHESH GHODKE AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.34/172 S.S. AND BROTHERS BUILDING GIDAPPA BLOCK, TANNERY ROAD FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005. SINCE DEAD R/BY HER LRS.

¶13

1a. SRI Y. MAHESH GODAKE S/O LATE YALLAPPA RAO AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS.

¶14

1b. M. SAGAR GHODAKE S/O SRI Y. MAHESH GHODAKE AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS.

¶15

1c. M. DIVYA GHODAKE D/O SRI Y. MAHESH GHODAKE AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS.

¶16

ALL 3 ARE R/AT MOHAN RESIDENCY FLAT NO.G3, NO.332, 6^TH A CROSS

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:15428 CRL.RP No. 215 of 2018

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

OMBR LAYOUT, BANASAWADI, BBMP BENGALURU - 560 043.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI MAHABALESHWAR G.C, ADV.)

¶23

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER AND SENTENCE DATED 14.11.2016 PASSED BY THE XIV ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.51426/2013 AND THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.01.2018 WHEREIN THE HON'BLE LVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.25063/2016 HAD CONFIRMED THE CONVICTION PART OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.11.2016 AND MODIFIED THE SENTENCE IN PART.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo. The

¶28

said memo reads as under:

¶29

"The petitioner most humbly prays that, this Hon'ble Court may please to permit her to withdraw the above Criminal Revision Petition in the interest of justice. Hence, this memo".

¶30

Placing the memo on record, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶31

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶32

NMS/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57

Smt. Vaishali v. Smt. M Sangeetha Ghodke

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Vaishali v. Smt. M Sangeetha Ghodke

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Radha S Srinath Vs Sri Rajashekar

Sun Power Technologies Vs Consul Neowatt Power Solution Pvt. Limited

M/S Mfi Finance and Investments (P) Limited Vs Smt. Padma

Mr Rohith Gulgulia Vs Mr Ramesh B Gowda

Mr Thyagaraj v Vs Mr B K Usman

Jupiter Publishers Vs Ubs Publishers