Dismissed¶¶28

Sri Srinivas Rai v. Miss Neha

Karnataka HC4 Jun 2026CRL.RP/1677/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; CRL.RP No. 1677 of 2025; Justice H.P. Sandesh; order dated 04.06.2026; dismissal for non-compliance of office objections; revision under S. 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C. (office ref 397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS)); challenges JMFC IX Court Mangaluru judgment dated 14.11.2024 in CC No.73/2022 and II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, D.K. Mangaluru judgment dated 13.08.2025 in Crl.A No.366/2024; I.A.No.1/2025 for suspension of sentence; parties Srinivas Rai v. Neha (represented by GPA holder Purushotham); advocate Mohammed Sultan; no merits argued, no cases cited, no quantum — not suitable as authority on substantive law.

What did the court decide?

Having regard to the petitioner's repeated failure to comply with office objections across five listings, the court held there was no ground to grant any adjournment. ¶¶27

Sri Srinivas Rai Vs Miss Neha — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:26568 CRL.RP No. 1677 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶8

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1677 OF 2025

¶9

(397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS))

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

SRI SRINIVAS RAI S/O NARAYANA RAI, AGED 48 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO.115, 1ST FLOOR,INLAND ORNATE, NAVABHARATH CIRCLE, KODIALBAIL, MANGALURU – 575003.

¶12

…PETITIONER

¶13

(BY SRI. MOHAMMED SULTAN,ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶16

MISS NEHA D/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED 28 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO.19-30/1, ”VIDYARANYA”, NEAR BHAGAVATHI TEMPLE,ULLAL, MANGALURU – 575 020, REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER MR. PURUSHOTHAM,S/O LATE M AITHAPPA, AGED 46 YEARS,R/AT DOOR NO.19-30/1, VIDYARANYA, NEAR BHAGAVATHI TEMPLE,ULLAL, MANGALURU 575 020.

¶17

…RESPONDENT

¶18

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO A. SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED

¶19

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:26568 CRL.RP No. 1677 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

JUDGMENT, DATED 14.11.2024 PASSED BY THE TRIAL COURT THE COURT OF JMFC IX COURT, MANGALURU IN CC NO.73/2022 BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION.B. SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 13.08.2025 PASSED BY THE COURT OF FIRST APPEAL THE II ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K.MANGALURU IN CRL.A NO.366/2024.I.A.NO.1/2025 FOR SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

There is no representation on either side.

¶26

This petition was filed on 07.11.2025. There

¶27

were 4 office objections. In spite of matter repeatedly posted before the Court as well as before the Registry, the revision petitioner has not complied the same and for the fifth time, this matter is listed for non-compliance. Hence, no ground to grant any adjournment. Accordingly, petition

¶28

is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections .

¶29

Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

¶30

SSD

¶31

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7

Sri Srinivas Rai v. Miss Neha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Srinivas Rai v. Miss Neha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pavankumar v G Vs Sri Thyagaraja Nagara Credit Co-Operative Society Limited

M/S Akash Shop and Save Firm Vs Sri G v Giri

Sri Reegun C Vs Smt. Pushpa

Smt. Shravani Vs Smt. B T Jayanthi

P.S Shiva Reddy Vs Sathyan Narayana Reddy

M Thyagraj Vs the State of Karnataka