Dismissed¶¶25

Sri Sreepada a v. Sri Shekar

Karnataka HC29 Jun 2026CRL.RP/1298/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of criminal revision petition for non-prosecution / non-compliance of office objections; Registrar listings and SOP minimum-objection compliance; petition under U/S 438 R/W 442 OF BNSS (CRL.RP No. 1298 of 2025); unaddressed prayer to set aside judgment dated 14.06.2023 in C.C.No.14634/2016, XIII Addl. CMM Bengaluru; NC: 2026:KHC:32081; High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; H.P. Sandesh, J.; order dated 29.06.2026.

What did the court decide?

Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted, the counsel for the petitioner was not diligent in prosecuting the matter. ¶¶25

Sri Sreepada a Vs Sri Shekar — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:32081 CRL.RP No. 1298 of 2025

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 29^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶7

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1298 OF 2025

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI SREEPADA A S/O ANANDA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.E-28, 3^RD CROSS 3^RD MAIN, MAGADI ROAD KAMAKSHIPALYA RANGANATHAPURA BANGALORE-560079

¶10

AND ALSO AT M/S ANANDA AND ENTERPRISES NO.822, 2^ND MAIN ROAD RANGANATHAPURA Digitally signed KAMAKSHIPALYA by DEVIKA M BANGALORE-560079 Location: HIGH COURT OF …PETITIONER KARNATAKA (BY SRI. GIRISH D M, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI SHEKAR S/O CHIKKACHENNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.34, 6^TH CROSS AZAD NAGAR, CHAMARAJPET BENGALURU-560018

¶11

…RESPONDENT

¶12

¶13

NC: 2026:KHC:32081 CRL.RP No. 1298 of 2025

¶14

HC-KAR

¶15

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 OF BNSS PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.06.2023 PASSED IN C.C.NO.14634/2016 BY THE XIII ADDL. CMM, BENGALURU AND ETC.

¶16

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶17

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶18

ORAL ORDER

¶19

This petition is filed for orders on non-compliance of office objections.

¶20

On perusal of the order sheet, it discloses that the petition is filed on 29.08.2025. Thereafter, the matter was listed before the Registrar on 04.09.2025 and 11.11.2025 for compliance of office objections and on both the occasions, the counsel for the petitioner was absent. On 29.01.2026, the counsel for the petitioner sought time to comply with the office objections before the Registrar so also on 26.02.2026 and granted the time to do the needful. Again on 02.04.2026, the counsel for the petitioner was absent before the Registrar. However, as a last chance, two weeks time was granted for compliance of office objections. On 15.06.2026 also there was

¶21

NC: 2026:KHC:32081 CRL.RP No. 1298 of 2025

¶22

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

no representation on behalf of the petitioner before the Registrar and in view of compliance of minimum objections as per SOP, directed to post the matter before the Court.

¶25

Today, the counsel for the petitioner again seeks time to comply the office objections. Out of eight office objections, five are complied and still, three office objections to be complied. Inspite of sufficient opportunity is granted, the counsel for the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the matter. Hence, there is no ground to keep the matter alive. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.

¶26

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

¶27

Sri Sreepada a v. Sri Shekar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Sreepada a v. Sri Shekar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri P K Bopanna Vs Sri P S Poovaiah

Priyadarshini Vs Sajith Krishna

Mr Chikkanna C Vs Mr Krishna T

Priscilla Patrao Vs Sri Ravi Richard D'Souza

Sri. a. Narayanaswamy @ Shanthappa Vs Sri. Suresh Y C

P S Devaiah Vs Dharmaja P D