Dismissed¶40

Sri. Jayashankar v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC5 Jan 2026CRL.P/9095/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: Jayashankar Nanjundappa; Susheela K.S.; CRL.P No. 9095 of 2022; Section 482 Cr.P.C.; quashing; Spl.C.C.No.1141/2019; Special Judge for CBI Cases Bengaluru (CCH34); Crime No.80/2017 Madiwala Police Station; Sections 403, 406, 409, 417, 419, 420, 120-B r/w 34 IPC; Section 9 KPIDFE Act 2004; dismissal for non-compliance of office objections; counsel absent; order sheet 28.10.2024; W.P.No.9124/2025 allowed 17.04.2025; High Court of Karnataka; Justice M G Uma; order dated 05.01.2026; petition dismissed, no adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

On the day of the order, learned counsel for the petitioner was absent with no representation even after the matter was passed over twice and again called at 3:30 p.m.; the 2022 petition was listed for the fourth time for compliance of office objections. ¶27

Sri. Jayashankar Vs State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:183 CRL.P No. 9095 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9095 OF 2022

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. JAYASHANKAR S/O NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.18, 2^ND FLOOR FLAT NO.2B, 1^ST CROSS PRANAV APARTMENT, R.M.V. EXTENSION SADASHIVANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 080

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. MAHESH R.D., ADVOCATE (AB))

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

STATE OF KARNATAKA MADIWALA POLICE STATION, BANGALORE - 560 068 REPRESENTED BY LEARNED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HCK, BANGALORE-01

¶15

SMT. SUSHEELA K.S., W/O NITISH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.101/1, 13^TH A CROSS 6^TH A MAIN, J.C. NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 086

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SRI. RANGASWAMY .R., HCGP FOR R1)

¶18

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ON THE SPL.C.C.NO.1141/2019 ON THE

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:183 CRL.P No. 9095 of 2022

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

FILE OF THE HONBLE XXXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES AT BENGALURU (CCH34) FOR THE OFFENCE U/S.403, 406, 409, 417, 419, 420, 120-B R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AND U/S.9 OF KPIDFE ACT 2004 WHICH IS ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.80/2017 OF MADIWALA POLICE STATION BENGALURU.

¶23

THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent, even when

¶26

the matter was passed over twice and again called at 3:30 p.m.

¶27

The petition is of the year 2022. It is listed for fourth time for compliance of office objections.

¶28

The order sheet dated 28.10.2024 reads as under:

¶29

"Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. There is no representation.

¶30

The petition is of the year 2022. The matter is listed for third time for compliance of office objections. Inspite of that the office objections are not complied with.

¶31

I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford a final opportunity, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections.

¶32

¶33

NC: 2026:KHC:183 CRL.P No. 9095 of 2022

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

List this matter after one week."

¶36

In-spite of that, there is no progress in the matter.

¶37

Learned HCGP has filed a memo dated 05.01.2026 stating

¶38