Smt Lakshmamma v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court 2026 — CRL.P No. 8414 of 2019 — Ravi V Hosmani J — S.482 Cr.PC quashing petition — PCR No.10193/2019, CMM Bengaluru — offences P/U/S 417 to 420, 423, 464, 465, 468, 471, 474, 506 R/W 34 IPC — petitioners Smt Lakshmamma, D. Manjula, Eranna, Smt. Bylamma — complainants/respondents G.N. Janardhan, G.J. Gurunath; State of Karnataka (Sampigehalli Police Station) — dismissal as infructuous on counsel's submission and Memo — no adjudication on merits — no precedents discussed.
What did the court decide?
On learned counsel for the petitioners submitting that the matter had been rendered infructuous, and a Memo being filed to that effect, the Memo was taken on record and the petition was dismissed as having become infructuous; the merits of the quashing prayer were not examined. ¶¶37-38