Disposed¶46

Sri R M Ajay v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC9 Jan 2026CRL.P/6117/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 482 CrPC quash petition; FIR Cr.No.64/2020 and Cr.No.63/2020, Cottonpet Police Station, Chickpet Sub-Division, Bengaluru; Section 384 r/w 34 IPC; petitioner R.M. Ajay, Police Inspector, State Intelligence, arraigned as Accused No.2; respondents State of Karnataka, Adil Azeez, Shaji George; State report of completed investigation, no material found against petitioner; Additional SPP Rashmi Jadhav; counsel Prasanna Kumar P; petitions do not survive for consideration; petitions closed; coram H.P. Sandesh J.; decided 09.01.2026; NC: 2026:KHC:1524.

What did the court decide?

Both petitions closed without adjudication on merits: the Court recorded that, following the State's report that investigation is completed and no material was found against the petitioner, the petitions do not survive for consideration. ¶46

Sri R M Ajay Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:1524 CRL.P No. 6117 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 6127 of 2024

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6117 OF 2024 C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6127 OF 2024

¶9

IN CRL.P NO.6117/2024:

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

SRI. R.M. AJAY S/O R B MOHAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, NOW WORKING AS POLICE INSPECTOR, STATE INTELLIGENCE, BENGALURU

¶12

R/AT NO.328/A, 9^TH ‘D’ MAIN ROAD, HRBR LAYOUT, 1^ST BLOCK, KALYAN NAGAR, BENGALURU-560043.

¶13

Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

(BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR P, ADVOCATE)

¶15

…PETITIONER

¶16

AND:

¶17

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY COTTONPET PS, CHICKPET SUB-DIVISION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEKDAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:1524 CRL.P No. 6117 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 6127 of 2024

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

SRI ADIL AZEEZ,

¶22

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.37, PRESTIGE ARCADE, BURLIN STREET, LANGFORD TOWN, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560025.

¶23

…RESPONDENTS

¶24

(BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, ADDL. SPP FOR R1; R2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

¶25

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.64/2020 AND FURTHER PROCEEDINGS REGISTERED BY THE 1^ST RESPONDENT/COTTONPET POLICE STATION AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER ARRAIGNING HIM AS ACCUSED NO.2 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 384 R/W 34 OF IPC AND ETC.

¶26

IN CRL.P NO.6127/2024:

¶27

BETWEEN:

¶28

SRI R.M. AJAY S/O R B MOHAN REDDY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS NOW WORKING AS POLICE INSPECTOR STATE INTELLIGENCE, BENGALURU R/AT NO.328/A 9^TH ‘D’ MAIN ROAD HRBR LAYOUT, 1^ST BLOCK KALYAN NAGAR BENGALURU-560043.

¶29

...PETITIONER

¶30

(BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR P, ADVOCATE)

¶31

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:1524 CRL.P No. 6117 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 6127 of 2024

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

AND:

¶34

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY COTTONPET PS CHIKPET SUB-DIVISION REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001.

¶35

SRI SHAJI GEORGE AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT NO.222, 14^TH CROSS EJIPURA MAIN ROAD VIVEKNAGAR BENGALURU-560047.

¶36

...RESPONDENTS

¶37

(BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, ADDL. SPP FOR R1; R2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

¶38

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.63/2020 AND FURTHER PROCEEDINGS REGISTERED BY THE 1^ST RESPONDENT/COTTONPET P.S., AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER ARRAIGNING HIM AS ACCUSED NO.2 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 384 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC AND ETC.

¶39

THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶40

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶41

4 - NC: 2026:KHC:1524 CRL.P No. 6117 of 2024 C/W CRL.P No. 6127 of 2024

¶42

HC-KAR

¶43

ORAL ORDER

¶44

The Additional SPP – Smt. Rashmi Jadhav files a memo stating that this Court directed the State on 04.12.2025 to report regarding the investigation status. Today, report is produced by the State stating that investigation is completed and not found any material in respect of the petitioner in Crl.P.Nos.6117/2024 and 6127/2024.

¶45

The counsel for the petitioner in both the cases is present before this Court.

¶46

In view of the report submitted by the learned Additional SPP stating that no material is found in respect of the petitioner in the above mentioned criminal petitions with regard to the alleged crime against the petitioner, Crl.P.Nos.6117/2024 and 6127/2024, do no survive for consideration. Accordingly, these petitions are closed.

¶47

Sd/-

¶48

(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

¶49

Sri R M Ajay v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri R M Ajay v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Byanna Vs Sri. Anjinappa

Mahalingappa @ Ananda Vs Jayamma

Chinnappa Vs Karibasappa

Jithesh Gowda Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. M.R.Lakshmanachari Vs Sri. K.P.Narayanaswamy

Sri D Harirao Jadhav Vs Shashank