Dismissed¶37

Sri. a. M. Hanumanthegowda v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC21 Jul 2026CRL.P/5266/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; CRL.P No. 5266 of 2022; Justice Ravi V Hosmani; Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashment of FIR; CR.No.145/2022 dated 20.04.2022, Kengeri Police Station; PCR.No.4913/2022, XXXII ACMM Bengaluru; offences under Sections 143, 147, 323, 324, 447, 448, 504, 506 r/w 149 IPC; dismissal of petition as infructuous; acceptance of 'B' report on 10.10.2024; memo by counsel Shreeranga T N / Nagaiah; respondents State of Karnataka and Sri Ramehs D Pawar; HCGP Chennappa Erappa.

What did the court decide?

Taking on record the memo noting disposal of PCR No.4913/2022 on 10.10.2024 by acceptance of 'B' report, the Court held the petition had become infructuous and dismissed it. ¶37

Sri. a. M. Hanumanthegowda Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

NC: 2026:KHC:37536 CRL.P No. 5266 of 2022

¶4

CNR: KAHC010255752022

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶6

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

¶9

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5266 OF 2022

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

SRI A. M. HANUMANTHEGOWDA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.164/1 SRI LAKSHMI FARM ULLALU VILLAGE, ULLALU POST 100 FEET ROAD, 4^TH BLOCK, SIR M VISVESHWARAIAH LAYOUT BENGALURU - 560 110.

¶12

Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

SMT. LATHA HANUMANTHEGOWDA W/O A M HANUMANTHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.164/1 SRI LAKSHMI FARM ULLALU VILLAGE, ULLALU POST 100 FEET ROAD, 4^TH BLOCK, SIR M VISVESHWARAIAH LAYOUT BENGALURU - 560 110.

¶14

SRI KISHAN AGARWAL S/O SHYAM SUNDAR AGARWAL AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.682, GANGA MANSION, 2^ND 'B' MAIN,

¶15

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:37536 CRL.P No. 5266 of 2022

¶18

CNR: KAHC010255752022

¶19

KORAMANGALA 8^TH BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 095.

¶20

…PETITIONERS

¶21

(BY SRI SHREERANGA T N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI NAGAIAH, ADVOCATE)

¶22

AND:

¶23

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SHO, KENGERI POLICE STATIN KENGERI BENGALURU - 560 060 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.

¶24

SRI RAMEHS D PAWAR S/O DAGADU PAWAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.23, 5^TH CROSS, GURUNATHA LAYOUT HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD CHIKKABANAVARA POST BENGALURU - 560 090.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

(BY SRI CHENNAPPA ERAPPA, HCGP FOR RESPONDENT/STATE)

¶27

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.145/2022 DATED 20.04.2022 AND PCR.NO.4913/2022 ON THE FILE OF XXXII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 143, 147, 323, 324, 447, 448, 504, 506 R/W 149 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF XXXII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU.

¶28

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION , THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

NC: 2026:KHC:37536 CRL.P No. 5266 of 2022

¶32

CNR: KAHC010255752022

¶33

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

¶34

ORAL ORDER

¶35

Challenging registration of Crime in CR.no.145/2022 dated 20.04.2022 and PCR.No.4913/2022 on file of XXXII ACMM, Bengaluru, for offence punishable under Sections 143, 147, 323, 324, 447, 448, 504, 506 r/w 149 of IPC, pending on file of XXXII ACMM, BENGALURU, this petition is filed.

¶36

Learned counsel for petitioners has filed a memo stating that during pendency of above petition, proceedings in PCR no.4913/2022 on file of XXXII ACMM, Bengaluru, came to be disposed of on 10.10.2024 by acceptance of 'B' report. A copy of case status is appended to memo. In view of above, it is submitted that above petition is rendered infructuous.

¶37

Taking above memo on record, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶38

Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE

¶39

YKL

¶40

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36

Sri. a. M. Hanumanthegowda v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. a. M. Hanumanthegowda v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G S Naveen Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Jayakumar Vs State of Karnataka

Abdul Kadhar Vs State of Karnataka

Shyla H N Vs State by

Rinny Eapen Vs State of Karnataka

Smt Leelavathi T Vs the State of Karnataka