Disposed¶36

Karthik J v. Vs the Station House Officer

Karnataka HC24 Mar 2026CRL.P/473/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of quashing petition - CRL.P No. 473 of 2026 - S. 482 Cr.P.C. / S. 528 BNSS - notices at Annexures 1-4 by 24th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru in CR. No.92/2024 and C.C. No.40985/2025 of West Women Police - petition disposed as withdrawn, not pressed, at admission stage via counsel's memo - coram: M. Nagaprasanna, J. - dated 24-03-2026 - no holding on merits.

What did the court decide?

Petition permitted to be withdrawn as not pressed on the counsel's memo; petition disposed of as withdrawn. No merits adjudicated, no directions or costs. ¶36

Karthik J v Vs the Station House Officer — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:16447 CRL.P No. 473 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 473 OF 2026

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

KARTHIK J.V., S/O VEERABHADRAIAH, AGED 34 YEARS, R/A NO. 81, 1^ST MAIN, 4^TH CROSS, SANJEEVINI NAGARA, HEGGANAHALLI CROSS, VISHWANEDEEM POST, BENGALURU - 560 091.

¶10

Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶11

SMT. SWETHA J.V., W/O SRINIVASU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/A NO.70C, HOSAPALYA, NEAR PEPSI GATE, VTC KUMBALAGODU, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU - 560 060.

¶12

SRI. SREENIVAS C, S/O CHANNEGOWDA, AGED 47 YEARS, R/A NO.70C, HOSAPALYA, NEAR PEPSI GATE, VTC KUMBALAGODU, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU - 560 060.

¶13

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:16447 CRL.P No. 473 of 2026

¶14

HC-KAR

¶15

SMT. DIVYASHREE U, W/O KARTHIK J.V, AGED 30 YEARS, R/A NO.81, 1^ST MAIN, 4^TH CROSS, SANJEEVINI NAGARA, HEGGANAHALLI CROSS, VISHWANEDEEM POST, BENGALURU - 560 091.

¶16

…PETITIONERS

¶17

(BY SRI. MADHUSUDHAN M.E., ADVOCATE)

¶18

AND:

¶19

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, WEST WOMEN POLICE STATION, BANGALORE DISTRICT. REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE - 560 001.

¶20

ARPITHA M., W/O DEEPAK J.V, AGED 29 YEARS, R/A NO.5/1, 2^ND MAIN ROAD, 5^TH CROSS ROAD, DEEPANJALINAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 026.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI. ANOOP KUMAR, HCGP FOR R1)

¶23

THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO (A) QUASH THE NOTICE WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE 1- TO 4 ISSUED BY THE HONBLE 24TH ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU IN CR.

¶24

¶25

NC: 2026:KHC:16447 CRL.P No. 473 of 2026

¶26

HC-KAR

¶27

NO.92/2024 AND C.C. NO.40985/2025 OF WEST WOMEN POLICE AGAINST THE PETITIONERS AND ETC.

¶28

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

¶29

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶30

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶31

ORAL ORDER

¶32

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed

¶33

reads as follows:

¶34

" MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶35

The undersigned counsel for the above named petitioner submits that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to withdraw the petitioner as not pressed as the same is quite essential in the interest of justice and equity. "

¶36

In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.

¶37

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA)

¶38

JUDGE

¶39

SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27

Karthik J v. Vs the Station House Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karthik J v. Vs the Station House Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Subhash Vs State by

Sri Suresh Kumar Vs State of Karnataka

Ramesh Vs State of Karnataka

Madhesh N Vs State by Attibele P S

Sri Narendra R Vs State of Karnataka

Subramanian v R Vs State of Karnataka