Dismissed

Sri. Riyaz v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC19 Sept 2026CRL.P/443/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 326, 504, 506, 307 read with 149 IPC. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous since charges had already been framed, granting liberty to raise all grounds during trial.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to raise all grounds during trial

Sri. Riyaz Vs the State of Karnataka — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:51468 CRL.P No. 443 of 2020

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

CNR: KAHC010521652019

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶6

DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 443 OF 2020

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. RIYAZ S/O M. UMMAR, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O MUKVE HOUSE, NARIMOGARU VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K. - 574 202.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(VIDE ORDER DATED 09.11.2021, BY SRI. VIVEK HEGDE, ADVOCATE AND SRI. SUYOG HERELE E, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH PUTTUR TOWN POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY

¶16

ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001.

¶17

SRI. KESHAVA NAYAK S/O SRI. SANJEEVA NAYAK, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O MYRA HOUSE, BILIYURU VILLAGE, PERNE POST,

¶18

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:51468 CRL.P No. 443 of 2020

¶21

CNR: KAHC010521652019

¶22

BANTWAL TALUK - 574 325.

¶23

…RESPONDENTS

¶24

(BY SRI. M. DIWAKAR MADDUR, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. SUDEEP BANGERA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶25

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.1436/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM AT PUTTUR FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 326, 504, 506, 307 R/W 149 OF IPC (VIDE ANNEXURE-A).

¶26

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶28

ORAL ORDER

¶29

L earned counsel for the petitioner and respondent

¶30

No.1 and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.2 are present.

¶31

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶32

the charge has already been framed and seeks liberty to raise all the grounds urged before this Court during the course of the trial.

¶33

NC: 2026:KHC:51468 CRL.P No. 443 of 2020

¶34

¶35

HC-KAR

¶36

CNR: KAHC010521652019

¶37

In view of the said submission, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous, reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise all the grounds urged before this

¶38

Court during the course of the trial.

¶39

Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

¶40

GJM

¶41

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19

Sri. Riyaz v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Riyaz v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases