The State of Karnataka v. Mr Abdul Basheer Moideen
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, single judge (Justice Ravi V Hosmani), 14-07-2026, CRL.P Nos. 3865, 3870, 3873, 4154, 4160, 4162, 4163, 4172, 4173 of 2019 (CNR KAHC010154482019). Keywords: Section 482 Cr.P.C.; Rule 43(8) Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957; release of seized vehicle; bank guarantee double vehicle value; seizure panchanama; surety bond; illegal mining/quarrying offences; Mangaluru; Dakshina Kannada; Crl.Misc.; State petition partly allowed; conditions modified per Crl.P.no.3801/2019 [2026:KHC:31770].
What did the court decide?
Petitions allowed in part; conditions imposed in the impugned release orders modified in terms of the order in Crl.P.no.3801/2019 [2026:KHC:31770]: respondents to furnish a renewable bank guarantee equal to double the value of the vehicle (as mentioned in the seizure panchanama or value assessed/mentioned in the surety bond, whichever is higher), in addition to the conditions already imposed, within two months or such extended period as the learned District Judge may allow.