Sri Guruprasad Naik @ Guruprasad v. Smt Sushmitha G @ Anu
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court (Bengaluru), single judge (Ravi V Hosmani, J.), order dated 03-06-2026 in CRL.P No. 2947 of 2022 — Guruprasad Naik (petitioner; counsel Rajesh Rao K) v. Sushmitha G @ Anu (respondent; counsel P. Nataraju). Petition under S.482 CrPC sought quashing of entire proceedings in Crl.Misc.No.642/2021 pending before the II Additional Principal Family Court, Mysuru. Dismissed purely as infructuous on counsel's memo; no merits ruling, no precedent cited, no quantum. Keywords: S.482 CrPC; quashing; Crl.Misc.; Family Court Mysuru; infructuous petition; memo; dismissal. Of value only as an instance of infructuous disposal, not for any proposition of law.
What did the court decide?
Taking on record the memo filed by learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the petition had been rendered infructuous, the petition was dismissed as having become infructuous; no finding was recorded on the merits of the quashing prayer.