Dismissed¶35

Sanjay Sabarad v. State of Karnataka by

Karnataka HC11 Mar 2026CRL.A/2500/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail appeal (CRL.A No.2500 of 2025, KPIDFE) under S.16 KPIDFE Act by three accused in Cr.No.239/2023, RMC Yard P.S., Peenya, Bengaluru; offences under S.9 KPID Act and Ss.406, 420 IPC; matter pending before 3rd ACMM Court, Nrupatunga Road, Bengaluru; CID investigating officer second respondent; appeal dismissed as not pressed after counsel's memo recording statements given to complainant police and absence of apprehension of arrest; liberty to file fresh appeal preserved. High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; Justice M.G.S. Kamal; 11-03-2026.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as not pressed; liberty to file a fresh appeal granted as sought in the memorandum. ¶35

Sanjay Sabarad Vs State of Karnataka by — Cheating and Forgery | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:15144 CRL.A No. 2500 of 2025

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 11^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2500 OF 2025 (KPIDFE)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SANJAY SABARAD

¶10

C/O BASAPPA SABARAD AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/A NO.47/1, 2ND FLOOR, AYYAPPA NILAYA, 11TH CROSS 9TH MAIN, AVALAHALLI GIRINAGAR, 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU-560085

¶11

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

PRASHANT TUKARAM BHOR S/O TUKARAM AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/A WARD NO-09, SANGALIKAR GALLI, JAMKHANDI TALUK, JAMKHANDI, BAGALKOT-587301

¶13

MUDASSAMAWAJ KHADRI S/O MOHAMMED JAFFAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/A KHB COLONY MANTOOR ROAD, MUDHOL, BAGALKOT, KARNATAKA PIN-587313

¶14

…APPELLANTS

¶15

(BY SRI. G.M. SHARATHKUMAR, ADVOCATE)

¶16

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:15144 CRL.A No. 2500 of 2025

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

AND:

¶19

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BY RMC YARD PS PEENYA SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560058

¶20

THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT CID HEAD QUARTERS, NO.1, CARLTON HOUSE, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560001

¶21

REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560001

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SRI. B. LAKSHMAN, HCGP ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)

¶24

¶25

THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 16 OF KPIDFE ACT PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE APPELLANTS ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN CR.NO.239/2023 REGISTERED BY RESPONDENT RMC YARD P.S., FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 9 OF KPID ACT, U/S 406,420 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF 3rd ACMM COURT, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU.

¶26

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

¶28

¶29

NC: 2026:KHC:15144 CRL.A No. 2500 of 2025

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶32

Learned counsel for the appellants files a Memo of even date which reads as under :

¶33

"The appellants respectfully submits to withdraw the present appeal as they have given their statement before the complainant police and there is no apprehension of arrest. Hence, this memo may be considered and the appellants may be permitted to withdraw the appeal as not pressed with liberty to file fresh appeal in the interest of justice."

¶34

Memo is taken on record.

¶35

Appeal is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as sought

¶36

for.

¶37

Sd/(M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE

¶38

RS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29

Sanjay Sabarad v. State of Karnataka by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Sabarad v. State of Karnataka by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B Venkataraju S/O. Late G Byrappa Vs Smt Tarabai W/O. Changanlal

Poornima K S Vs Sri Prashanth R

Sri H M Ramaiah Vs the Executive Director

S. J. Jagan Mohan Vs K. Prashanth

Gurumurthy M R @ Guru @ Gombe Vs State of Karnataka

Smt Jayabai Vs the State of Karnataka