Dismissed

Sri T H Imam Hussain v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC19 Sept 2026CRL.P/1984/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed in 2020 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the cognizance order and summons issued against the petitioner in a criminal case. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner's counsel failed to appear despite the matter being called multiple times over six years.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; no relief granted.

Sri T H Imam Hussain Vs State of Karnataka — Quashing and FIR | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:51474 CRL.P No. 1984 of 2020

¶3

CNR: KAHC010027432020

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1984 OF 2020

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. T.H. IMAM HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O LATE T. MOHAMMED HABEEBULLA CHC 1317, TOWN POLICE STATION CHITRADURGA TOWN AND DISTRICT-577501 OLD ADDRESS: P.1170, RURAL POLICE STATION CHITRADURGA-577500.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. TAJUDDIN, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY O/O ADVOCATE GENERAL STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT COMPLEX BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001.

¶16

SMT. SUMA W/O SIDDESH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS HOUSE WIFE R/AT BIMASAMUDRA VILLAGE CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-57750.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SRI. SUHAS GOWDA M., HCGP FOR R1; SRI. M. DEVARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶19

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

NC: 2026:KHC:51474 CRL.P No. 1984 of 2020

¶22

CNR: KAHC010027432020

¶23

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNEXURE-C AND SUMMONS PROCESS ISSUED AS PER ANNEXURE-E THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF TAKING COGNIZANCE FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S. 323, 324, 326, 354, 504 AND 506 R/W 149 OF IPC DATED 04.06.2019 PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., CHITRADURGA VIDE ANNEXURE-C BY ALLOWING THIS CRL.P IN SO FAR IT IS PERTAINING TO PETITIONER WHO IS 6TH ACCUSED IN PCR NO.141/2012 IN THE COURT OF I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., CHITRADURGA AND SUMMONS PROCESS ISSUED AGAINST 6TH ACCUSED VIDE ANNEXURE-E.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

This matter is called twice in the morning and also in the afternoon, no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶28

Though this petition was filed in 2020, even after

¶29

lapse of six years, learned counsel for the petitioner is not pursuing the matter. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 is present on both the occasions, so also learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1. Hence, it clearly

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:51474 CRL.P No. 1984 of 2020

¶31

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

CNR: KAHC010027432020

¶34

discloses that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.

¶35

Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed.

¶36

Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

¶37

ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30

Sri T H Imam Hussain v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri T H Imam Hussain v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases