Sri.Chethan K Vs State of Karnataka

SRI. CHETHAN K., S/O LATE APPAJI, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RESIDING AT KEBBALLI VILLAGE, NIDASALE POST, HULIYURUDURGA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 123.

¶11

Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

SMT. INDRAMMA, W/O LATE APPAJI, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT KEBBALLI VILLAGE, NIDASALE POST, HULIYURUDURGA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 123.

¶13

SRI. KRISHNAPPA J., S/O JOGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.52, 4^TH CROSS, 2^ND MAIN, NETHAJI LAYOUT, VIJAYNAGAR 2^ND STAGE, BENGALURU – 560 040.

¶14

SRI. RAGHU PRASAD J., S/O. JAGADEESH H,

¶15

2 -

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:36546 CRL.P No. 1900 of 2026

¶18

CNR: KAHC010087052026

¶19

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT: NO.09, 11^TH CROSS, DODDABIDARAKALLU, VENUGOPALA NAGAR, NAGASANDRA, BENGALURU – 560 073.

¶20

SMT. SHRUTHI K.A., W/O RAGHUPRASAD J., AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.201, R/AT.NO.09, 11^TH CROSS, DODDABIDARAKALLU, VENUGOPALA NAGAR, NAGASANDRA, BENGALURU – 560 073.

¶21

SMT. KUSUMA B.S., W/O. KRISHNAPPA J., AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT. NO.29, 1^ST MAIN, 2^ND CROSS, NETHAJI LAYOUT, VIJAYNAGAR 2^ND STAGE, BENGALURU – 560 040.

¶22

SMT.KALAVATHI @ CHANDRAKALA B.S., W/O. BASAVARAJU H.S., AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.52, 4^TH CROSS, 1^ST MAIN, NETHAJI LAYOUT, VIJAYNAGAR 2^ND STAGE, BENGALURU – 560 040.

¶23

…PETITIONERS

¶24

(BY SRI. PRAMOD K.B., ADVOCATE)

¶25

AND:

¶26

3 -

¶27

HC-KAR

¶28

NC: 2026:KHC:36546 CRL.P No. 1900 of 2026

¶29

CNR: KAHC010087052026

¶30

STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE M.K. DODDI POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU – 560 001.

¶31

SMT. MANASA S.V., W/O CHETHAN K, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDING AT SEEBANAHALLI VILLAGE, MALUR HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 562 160.

¶32

…RESPONDENTS

¶33

(BY SMT.WAHEEDA M.M., HCGP FOR R-1; SRI.RAJAYOGA K, ADVOCATE)

¶34

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT DTD 17.10.2025 AT ANNEXURE-B AND FIR DTD 17.10.2025 AT ANNEXURE-A PURSUANT TO CR.NO.130/2025 REGISTERED IN M.K.DODDI P.S., AGAINST THE PETITIONERS, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHANNAPATNA, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 143, 323, 504 R/W SECTION 149 OF IPC AND SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF D.P ACT.

¶35

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶36

4 -

¶37

HC-KAR

¶38

NC: 2026:KHC:36546 CRL.P No. 1900 of 2026

¶39

CNR: KAHC010087052026

¶40

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶41

ORAL ORDER

¶42

The petitioners are before this Court calling in question proceedings in Crime No.130/2025, pending before the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC at Channapatna, Ramanagar District, for the offences under Sections 143, 323, 504 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶43

Heard Sri.Pramod K.B., learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Smt.Waheeda M.M., learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.1, Sri.Rajayoga K, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 and have perused the material on record.

¶44

During the pendency of the proceedings, the petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 have settled the dispute among themselves and have filed a Compromise Petition in M.C.No.5/2026 before the Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC

¶45

5 -

¶46

HC-KAR

¶47

NC: 2026:KHC:36546 CRL.P No. 1900 of 2026

¶48

CNR: KAHC010087052026

¶49

Court at Channapatna and have filed a Joint Memo to that effect before this Court, which reads as follows:

¶50

“1. The above Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of the Complaint dated 17.10.2025, the First Information Report dated 17.10.2025 registered in Crime No.0130/2025 by M.K. Doddi Police Station, and all further proceedings arising therefrom.

¶51

It is respectfully submitted that during the pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the Petitioners and Respondent No.2 have amicably resolved all their matrimonial disputes through the intervention of elders and well-wishers. Pursuant thereto, the parties have entered into a comprehensive Compromise Petition in M.C.No.5/2026 before the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, at Channapatna.

¶52

The learned Principal Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, at Channapatna has, by Judgment and Decree dated 08.04.2026, accepted the compromise entered into between the parties and dissolved the marriage by a decree of divorce in terms of the compromise petition. The compromise forms part and parcel of the decree. 4. As one of the terms of the compromise, Respondent No.2 has unequivocally agreed to co-operate in quashing the present criminal proceedings and has undertaken not to raise any objection to the quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings. The parties have further agreed to withdraw all allegations made against each other and have declared that they have no subsisting claims or disputes, civil or criminal, arising out of their matrimonial relationship.

¶53

In view of the complete settlement arrived at between the parties and the decree passed by the competent Civil Court, the continuation of the criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose and would amount to an unnecessary abuse of the process of law. Since the dispute is purely matrimonial in nature and has been amicably

¶54

6 -

¶55

HC-KAR

¶56

NC: 2026:KHC:36546 CRL.P No. 1900 of 2026

¶57

CNR: KAHC010087052026

¶58

resolved, no useful purpose would be served by permitting the criminal proceedings to continue.

¶59

It is therefore just, proper and necessary that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to secure the ends of justice.

¶60

WHEREFORE , the Petitioners and Respondent No.2 most respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:

¶61

a) Allow the above Criminal Petition;

¶62

b) Quash the Complaint dated 17.10.2025 (Annexure-A), the First Information Report dated 17.10.2025 (Annexure-B), and all further proceedings arising out of Crime No.0130/2025 registered by M.K. Doddi Police Station, pending on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Channapatna, Ramanagara District, for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 504 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, in the interest of justice and equity; and

¶63

c) Pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶64

The petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 are

¶65

present before the Court and are identified by their respective counsels.

¶66

In the light of Compromise Petition filed in M.C.No.5/2026 before the Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC

¶67

Court at Channapatna being filed and also a Joint Memo as

¶68

7 -

¶69

HC-KAR

¶70

NC: 2026:KHC:36546 CRL.P No. 1900 of 2026

¶71

CNR: KAHC010087052026

¶72

quoted supra to that effect being filed before this Court, I deem it appropriate to accept the said Joint Memo and terminate the proceedings against the petitioners in the subject petition.

¶73

For the aforesaid reasons, the following:

¶74

ORDER

¶75

[I] Criminal Petition is disposed .

¶76

[II] Complaint and FIR both dated 17.10.2025 pursuant to Crime No.130/2025, pending before the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC at Channapatna, Ramanagar District, stands quashed qua the petitioners.

¶77

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶78

CBC

¶79

List No.: 3 Sl No.: 6

Sri.Chethan K v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri.Chethan K v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naveena Msk Vs State of Karnataka

Mr Munesh Vs State of Karnataka

Sri H G Venkatachalapathy @ Chalapathy Vs State by Cubbon Park Police

Sri. Pradeep. R Vs State by Kanakapur Town

Smt Ganavi Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri.Mohammed Saqlain Vs State of Karnataka by