Allowed¶42

Imran Khan @ Sri Yousuff Shariff @ D Babu v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC3 Mar 2026CRL.P/177/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing of criminal proceedings on compromise/settlement between accused and complainant; application under S.320 r/w S.482 CrPC; offences held not heinous (SS 341, 504, 506, 353 IPC); Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 relied upon; prosecution in C.C.No.5666/2020 (Crime No. 245/2015, Halasurgate PS) before I Addl. CMM Bengaluru compounded; voluntary compromise, unconditional apology, undertaking against parallel proceedings; High Court of Karnataka, R. Nataraj J., 03-03-2026.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; the entire criminal proceedings in C.C.No.5666/2020 pending trial before the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, compounded. ¶42

Imran Khan @ Sri Yousuff Shariff @ D Babu Vs State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:12908 CRL.P No. 177 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO.177 OF 2022

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

IMRAN KHAN @ SRI. YOUSUFF SHARIFF @ D. BABU S/O. DASTAGIR SHARIFF AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS PROPRIETOR

¶10

UMRAH DEVELOPERS NO.13/1, MILLERS TANK BUND ROAD KAVERIAPPA LAYOUT, VASANTH NAGAR BENGALURU-560 052

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR;

¶13

SRI GAURAV N., ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

Digitally signed by SUMA

¶16

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶17

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HALASURGATE POLICE STATION BENGALURU CITY.

¶18

SRI L. C. NAGARAJ ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH KANDAYA BHAVAN K. G. ROAD BENGALURU CITY-560 009

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI HARISH GANAPATHI, H.C.G.P., FOR R-1; SRI H. K. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)

¶21

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:12908 CRL.P No. 177 of 2022

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN C.C.NO.5666/2020 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 341, 504, 506 AND 353 OF IPC PENDING BEFORE THE HON'BLE I ACMM COURT, BENGALURU.

¶24

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

The petitioner herein has challenged a charge sheet filed against him for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 504, 506 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code (henceforth referred to as 'IPC') in C.C.No.5666/2020 and the consequent order taking cognizance by the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru.

¶28

Today, the petitioner and the respondent No.2 have filed an application under Section 320 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (henceforth referred to as 'Cr.P.C'). In paragraph Nos.3, 4 and 5 of the said application, it is stated as follows:

¶29

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:12908 CRL.P No. 177 of 2022

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

"3. It is submitted that, the Petitioner and Respondent No.2 have decided to put an end to the proceedings in CC No. 5666/2020 and lead their personal life cordially and therefore the second Respondent has agreed to quash the proceedings in CC No. 5666/2020 pending on the file of Hon'ble I Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Bengaluru, which arises out of Crime No. 245/2015 of the Halsurgate Police Station, Bengaluru for offences punishable under Sections 341, 504, 506 & 353 of the IPC and that there is no coercion or force is applied on the Respondent No.2.

¶33

4. The Petitioner/Accused submits that this compromise petition is voluntary and the petitioner/Accused will not initiate any other parallel proceedings claiming for damages, malicious prosecution etc. against the Respondent/Complainant with regard to the above matter before any court of law and agrees and undertake to that effect.

¶34

5. In view of the settlement in between Petitioner and Respondent No.2, the Petitioner has agreed to tender an unconditional apology to the Respondent No. 2 in view of the full and final settlement."

¶35