Petition seeking bail under Section 439 Cr.PC in a pending sessions case involving offences including Sections 448, 354(B), 384 and 376 IPC was dismissed as the petitioner showed no interest in prosecuting it; liberty reserved to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:21182 CRL.P No.16791/2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CRIMINAL PETITION NO.16791/2025 (439(Cr.PC) /
483(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
UPENDRA S/O ASURAJ AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/AT 70/125 SUBRAMANI BUILDING 6TH CROSS, KUNDANAHALLI DODDANEKUNDI, BENGALURU. (BY SRI. TEJAS, ADV., FOR SRI. YOGESH G, ADV.,)
…PETITIONER
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA VARTHUR POLICE STATION BENGALURU REP. BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAHUL RAI K, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNNS) PRAYING TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.41/2020 WHICH IS NUMBERED AS SC NO.77/2021 OF RESPONDENT VARTHUR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED VI ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, FOR AN ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/S 448, 354(B), 384, 323, 376, 511, 342 OF IPC & ETC.
NC: 2026:KHC:21182 CRL.P No.16791/2025
HC-KAR
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner was not present yesterday i.e., on 16.04.2026, hence, the matter is adjourned to today.
Sri.Tejas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri.Yogesh G., learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not have the file and his senior is out of station.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution. However, liberty is reserved to file fresh petition.
Sd/(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
BSR/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5
9 provisions across 3 enactments
Upendra
State of Karnataka, Varthur Police Station, Bengaluru
Vijaykumar A. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
