Sri.S.Sudhakar v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC9 Jul 2026CRL.P/15335/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of quashing petition; memo for withdrawal accepted; charge sheet filed during pendency rendering relief infructuous; intention to file fresh petition challenging charge sheet; S. 482 Cr.P.C.; S. 528 BNSS-2023; Ss. 406, 417, 420 IPC; Crime No. 676/2024; Varthur Police Station; II A.C.J.M. Rural Court Bengaluru; II Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Rural District Bengaluru; M/s Vahe Projects Pvt. Ltd.; S. Sudhakar; Bala Gopal; State of Karnataka; HCGP K. Nageshwarappa; advocate G.M. Gadilingappa; Justice M. Nagaprasanna; High Court of Karnataka; 2026; disposed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Petition permitted to be withdrawn and disposed as withdrawn, in terms of the memo for withdrawal (which had sought liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the charge sheet). ¶¶37

Sri.S.Sudhakar Vs the State of Karnataka — Cheating and Forgery | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:34963 CRL.P No. 15335 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15335 OF 2025

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. S. SUDHAKAR S/O SRI. K.M. SANLINGAM, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, DIRECTOR OF M/S VAHE PROJECTS PVT. LTD., PRESENTLY RESIDING AT APT NO. 23194, 19TH FLOOR TOWER 23 (KIARA), PARCEL 4, PRESTIGE LAKESIDE HABITAT, VARTHUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 087.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. G.M. GADILINGAPPA, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶15

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶16

BY VARTHUR POLICE STATION, (REPRESENTED BY LEARNED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR) THE HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶17

SRI. BALA GOPAL S/O SRI. ASWATH NARAYANA SHEETY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, NO. 153, 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN,

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:34963 CRL.P No. 15335 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

4TH STAGE, TK LAYOUT, MYSURU CITY - 560 009.

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)

¶24

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.676/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE II A.C.J.M RURAL COURT AT BENGALURU AGAINST THE PETITIONER / ACCUSED FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 406, 417, 420 OF IPC OF VARTHUR POLICE AT BENGALURU.

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:

¶29

" MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶30

The under signed counsel for the petitioner most respectfully submits that:

¶31

The above Criminal Petition was filed under Section 528 of BNSS-2023 seeking quashing of the proceedings initiated against the Petitioner and for an order of stay of further investigation by the Respondent No.1 police in Crime No.676/2024, during the pendency of the above petition, the respondent No.1 police have completed the investigation and have filed the charge sheet against the

¶32

¶33

NC: 2026:KHC:34963 CRL.P No. 15335 of 2025

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

Accused/Petitioner before the Hon'ble II Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rural District at Bengaluru. In view of filing of the charge sheet, the relief sought in the present Criminal Petition has become infurctuous and hence the petitioner intends to challenge the Charge Sheet and all consequential proceedings by filing an appropriate petition before this Hon'ble Court.

¶36

Hence, the above named petitioner may kindly be permitted to withdraw the above Criminal Petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in the interest of Justice and Equity."

¶37

In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.

¶38

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA)

¶39

JUDGE

¶40

SJK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0

Sri.S.Sudhakar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri.S.Sudhakar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri T Y Uday Kumar Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Ramachandra Vs State of Karnataka

Mrs Priyanka Jain Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Achanta Satya Venkata Krishna Vs State of Karnataka

T Chinnagiriyappa Vs State of Karnataka by

K. Srinivasa Vs the State of Karnataka