Partly allowed

Madhu Sudhan Reddy v. State by Vidyaranyapura Ps

Karnataka HC18 Sept 2026CRL.P/12737/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka heard two connected criminal petitions under Section 482 BNSS seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No. 271/2026 for offences under Sections 318(4), 61 and 3(5) BNS. The petitioners were accused of entering into a sale agreement for an apartment, receiving Rs. 60 lakh, and subsequently selling the same property to another person. The court found a prima facie case of conspiracy and cheating against accused Nos. 1 and 3 (husband and brother), and dismissed their bail pleas. For accused No. 2 (wife of accused No. 1), the court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to Accused No. 2 (Nandhni Reddy) subject to conditions; bail denied to Accused Nos. 1 and 3.

Madhu Sudhan Reddy Vs State by Vidyaranyapura Ps — Cheating and Forgery | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

NC: 2026:KHC:51131 CRL.P No. 12737 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 13464 of 2026

¶4

CNR: KAHC010573932026

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶6

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12737 OF 2026

¶9

C/W

¶10

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13464 OF 2026

¶11

IN CRL.P No. 12737/2026

¶12

BETWEEN:

¶13

Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

MADHU SUDHAN REDDY S/O. BALAKRISHNA REDDY YERRAM REDDY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT FLAT NO. B204, FIRST FLOOR, B BLOCK, MULTI INFINITE APARTMENT, WARD NO. ATTUR-03, AT CHIKKABETTAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 097.

¶15

(BY SRI. MANJUNATH B, ADVOCATE)

¶16

…PETITIONER

¶17

AND:

¶18

STATE BY VIDYARANYAPURA PS REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT KARNATAKA COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶19

…RESPONDENT

¶20

(BY SRI. RAHUL RAI K, HCGP)

¶21

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

NC: 2026:KHC:51131 CRL.P No. 12737 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 13464 of 2026

¶24

CNR: KAHC010573932026

¶25

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 438 OF CR.P.C (U/S 482 BNSS) PRAYING TO GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO THE PETITIONER AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE i.e., VIDYARANYAPURA POLICE TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THERE ARREST IN CR.NO.271/2026, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 318(4), 61, 3(5) OF BNS, PENDING BEFORE THE LEARNED VII ACJM, AT BENGALURU.

¶26

IN CRL.P NO. 13464/2026

¶27

BETWEEN:

¶28

MALLIKARJUN REDDY S/O. BALAKRISHNA REDDY YERRAM REDDY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT. FLAT NO. A-306, VINYAAS VIRTUE APARTMENTS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, MES RING ROAD, SHARADAMBANAGAR, JALAHALLI VILLAGE, BENGALURU - 560 013.

¶29

NANDHNI REDDY

¶30

W/O. MALIKARJUN REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT. FLAT NO. A-306, VINYAAS VIRTUE APARTMENTS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, MES RING ROAD, SHARADAMBANAGAR, JALAHALLI VILLAGE, BENGALURU - 560 013.

¶31

...PETITIONERS

¶32

(BY SRI. MANJUNATH B, ADVOCATE)

¶33

AND:

¶34

STATE BY VIDYARANYAPURA P.S., REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT KARNATAKA COMPLEX,

¶35

¶36

HC-KAR

¶37

NC: 2026:KHC:51131 CRL.P No. 12737 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 13464 of 2026

¶38

CNR: KAHC010573932026

¶39

BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶40

...RESPONDENT

¶41

(BY SRI. RAHUL RAI K, HCGP)

¶42

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 438 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 482 BNSS) PRAYING TO GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO THE PETITIONER NO.1 AND 2 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE I.E VIDYARANYAPURA TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER NO.1 AND 2 ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THERE ARREST IN CR.NO.271/2026 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 318(4), 61 AND 3(5) OF BNS PENDING BEFORE THE LEARNED VII A.C.J.M AT BENGALURU.

¶43

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶44

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶45

ORAL ORDER

¶46

Accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.271/2026 registered by Vidyaranyapura Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 61 read with Section 3 (5) of BNS 2023, are before this Court in these petitions filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, seeking anticipatory bail.

¶47

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶48

¶49

HC-KAR

¶50

NC: 2026:KHC:51131 CRL.P No. 12737 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 13464 of 2026

¶51

CNR: KAHC010573932026

¶52

FIR in Crime No.271/2026 was registered by

¶53

Vidyaranyapura Police Station, Bengaluru City for the aforesaid offences against the petitioners herein, based on the first information dated 13.07.2026 received from Smt Jyothi M.S., W/o. Tarun Kamineni. Apprehending arrest in the case, the petitioners had approached the jurisdictional Sessions Court seeking anticipatory bail. Since their petitions were rejected, they are before this Court in these two petitions.

¶54

Perusal of the material on record would go to show that accused No.1 is the husband of accused No.2 and brother of accused No.3. It appears that accused No.1 was c onstructing an apartment building and the first informant and her husband had approached accused No.1 for the purpose of purchasing a three-bedroom, hall and kitchen apartment from accused No.1. Thereafter, they had entered into an agreement for sale with accused No.1 and allegedly had paid a sum of Rs.60,00,000/- under the agreement.

¶55

¶56

HC-KAR

¶57

NC: 2026:KHC:51131 CRL.P No. 12737 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 13464 of 2026

¶58

CNR: KAHC010573932026

¶59

It is further alleged that certain amount was

¶60

also paid to accused No.2 for the purpose of interior decoration of the apartment which was the subject matter of the sale agreement. Accused No.1, who had entered into an agreement for sale with the first informant after receiving the valid sale consideration from them, subsequently has sold the very same property in favour of the wife of accused No.3 under a registered sale deed dated 29.09.2023. Allegation against accused Nos.1 and 3 is of conspiracy and cheating.

¶61

From the aforesaid, it is apparent that there is a prima facie case as against accused Nos.1 and 3, and therefore, their prayer for anticipatory bail needs to be rejected. Considering the nature of allegation against accused No.2, who is the wife of accused No.1, I am of the opinion that her prayer for grant of anticipatory bail can be answered affirmatively. Accordingly, the following:

¶62

¶63

HC-KAR

¶64

NC: 2026:KHC:51131 CRL.P No. 12737 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 13464 of 2026

¶65

CNR: KAHC010573932026

¶66

O R D E R

¶67

i) Criminal Petition No.13464/2026 is partly

¶68

allowed .

¶69

ii) Criminal Petition No.12737/2026 is dismissed

¶70

iii) The criminal petitions are dismissed as against accused Nos.1 and 3 and allowed insofar accused No.2 is concerned.

¶71

iv) The respondent - Police or any other police in the State of Karnataka are directed to release the accused No.2 in the event of her arrest in Crime No.271/2026 registered by Vidyaranyapura Police Station, Bengaluru City for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 61 read with Section 3 (5) of BNS 2023, s ubject to the following conditions:

¶72

a) Accused No.2 shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 15 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order and shall execute a personal bond for a

¶73

¶74

HC-KAR

¶75

NC: 2026:KHC:51131 CRL.P No. 12737 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 13464 of 2026

¶76

CNR: KAHC010573932026

¶77

sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the investigating officer.

¶78

b) Accused No.2 shall regularly appear before the Trial Court without fail unless exempted by the Trial Court for valid reasons.

¶79

c) Accused No.2 shall not tamper with the prosecution witness and she shall cooperate with the police for investigation and appear before them whenever called upon.

¶80

d) Accused No.2 shall not involve in similar offences in future.

¶81

Sd/(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE

¶82

SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 66

Madhu Sudhan Reddy v. State by Vidyaranyapura Ps

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhu Sudhan Reddy v. State by Vidyaranyapura Ps

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases