Dismissed¶28-29

Smt. Mahaboobi D/O Mainuddin Maniyar v. State of Karnataka

Anticipatory bail – Section 482 BNSS

Karnataka HC23 Jan 2026CRL.P/105283/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal disposal: anticipatory-bail petition under S.482 BNSS (CRL.P No.105283 of 2025) by accused No.5 in Crime No.201/2025 of Hanagal Police Station (offences under BNS, 2023 Ss.105, 109, 118(1), 115(2), 191(3), 190, 191(2), 351(2), 189(2), 74, 351(3), 352, 85, 86 and Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Ss.3-4); dismissed as not pressed with liberty to reapproach on change of circumstances; High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench; V.SRISHANANDA, J.; order dated 23-01-2026; NC: 2026:KHC-D:861.

What did the court decide?

Liberty as prayed for - liberty to withdraw the petition as not pressed and to reapproach this Court on change of circumstances. ¶28-29

Smt. Mahaboobi D/O Mainuddin Maniyar Vs State of Karnataka — Dowry and Cruelty | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC-D:861 CRL.P No. 105283 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD

¶5

DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 105283 OF 2025 (438(CR.PC)/482(BNSS))

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SMT. MAHABOOBI D/O. MAINUDDIN MANIYAR AGED 36 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD R/O. ONIKERI, MUNDGOD TALUK UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. SHIVA SHIRUR, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH INVESTIGATION OFFICER, HANAGAL POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD 580001.

¶15

…RESPONDENT

¶16

(BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP)

¶17

Digitally signed byCHANDRASHEKARLAXMANKATTIMANI Location: HighCourt of Karnataka,Dharwad Bench

¶18

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF BNSS, SEEKING TO GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.5 IN CONNECTION WITH CRIME NO.201/2025 OF HANAGAL POLICE STATION AND PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND J.M.F.C. HANAGAL, HAVERI REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 105, 109, 118(1), 115(2), 191(3), 190, 191(2), 351(2), 189(2), 74, 351(3), 352, 85, 86 OF BNS, 2023 AND SECTION 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, 1961, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

¶19

2 - NC: 2026:KHC-D:861 CRL.P No. 105283 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

¶24

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the

¶25

petitioner filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition.

¶26

The memo reads as under:

¶27

"Herein, the advocate for the petitioner most respectfully submits as under: That, the petitioner herein intends to withdraw the top noted criminal petition as not pressed and seek liberty of this Hon’ble Court to reapproach this Hon’ble Court on change of circumstances, the same may kindly be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶28

Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as

¶29

not pressed with liberty as prayed for.

¶30

Sd/(V.SRISHANANDA)

¶31

JUDGE

¶32

SMM / Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 7

Smt. Mahaboobi D/O Mainuddin Maniyar v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Mahaboobi D/O Mainuddin Maniyar v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhawaralal Kumawat Vs Gangadhara B N

Anil S/O Nagappa Mang Vs the State of Karnataka

Mahadeshwar B Lingdal Vs the State of Karnataka

Ravi Prakash Reddy H. S/O Late Rajagopal Vs Suco Souharda Sahakari Bank Ltd.

Hanamant S/O Shenkrappa Naganur Vs the State of Karnataka

Ramesh Vasudev Naik Vs the West Coast Paper Mill Ltd.