Dismissed¶33

Ningappa S/O. Siddappa Matagar v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC27 Jan 2026CRL.P/104033/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

S.482 CrPC quash petition; offences under Ss.153, 505(1)(b), 505(1)(c) IPC; Navanagar Police Station Crime No.0131/2022; Bagalkot; dismissed as withdrawn on petitioner's memo with liberty to file fresh petition; no merits adjudicated; single judge (V. Srishananda), Karnataka HC Dharwad, order dated 27-01-2026.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh criminal petition. ¶33

Ningappa S/O. Siddappa Matagar Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC-D:982 CRL.P No. 104033 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD

¶5

DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 104033 OF 2022 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS))

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

NINGAPPA S/O. SIDDAPPA MATAGAR AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. SHOROL VILLAGE, TQ. MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOT-587103.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. LINGRAJ MARADI, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶15

THROUGH NAVANAGAR POLICE STATION, BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENCH AT DHARWAD580011.

¶16

Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench.

¶17

SHIVANAND MALLAPPA TAVALI AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT, DIST. BAGALKOT-587103.

¶18

…RESPONDENTS

¶19

(BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. SIDDAPPA S. SAJJAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶20

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN NAVANAGAR POLICE STATION CRIME NO. 0131/2022 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 153, 505(1)(B), 505(1)(C) IPC IN RESPECT PETITIONER/ACCUSED IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

¶21

¶22

NC: 2026:KHC-D:982 CRL.P No. 104033 of 2022

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal. The memo reads as under:

¶28

MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶29

“The petitioner seeks leave of this Hon’ble Court to

¶30

file the present memo for withdrawal of the case.

¶31

The petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant permission to withdraw the present petition, with the liberty to file a fresh criminal petition in the interest of justice and equity.

¶32

Wherefore, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to dismiss the present petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶33

Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for .

¶34

Sd/(V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶35

RHR/-Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 25

Ningappa S/O. Siddappa Matagar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ningappa S/O. Siddappa Matagar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Mallikarjuna S/O Shivappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Shivanappa Wari Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Appasab S/O Sadashiv Mokashi Vs Sri Malkari S/O Gangappa Mali

Santosh S/O Kumar Alias Raju Koppad Vs the State of Karnataka

Shivasharanappa Shivappa Kusanoor Vs Shri. Mahalaxmi Credit Souhard Sahakari Ltd. Bhoj

Channaveerayya S/O Fakirayya Hiremath Vs the State of Karnataka