Dismissed¶¶45

Ms Nazaneen Gulahmed Danewale v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC16 Feb 2026CRL.P/102535/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Dharwad (NC: 2026:KHC-D:2303), CRL.P No. 102535 of 2021, decided 16.02.2026 by Justice V. Srishananda. Quashing petition under S. 482 Cr.P.C. (mapped as 528 BNSS) against charge sheet in CC No. 411/2020, Tilakwadi PS, Belagavi, for offences u/S 143, 323, 427, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC; DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on counsel's memo, with liberty to move discharge application before the trial court. Withdrawal-stage order only — no ruling on merits, no precedent discussed; limited citational value except for the fact of withdrawal and liberty granted.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for in the memo — liberty to move a discharge application before the trial court. ¶¶45

Ms Nazaneen Gulahmed Danewale Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC-D:2303 CRL.P No. 102535 of 2021

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD

¶5

DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102535 OF 2021

¶9

(482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS))

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

MS. NAZANEEN GULAHMED DANEWALE AGE 59 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. CTS NO. 2756 (PLOT NO. 61) BUDA SCHEME NO. 51 LAXMI TEK BELAGAVI590001.

¶12

SHRI SAMEER BASHIRAHMED DANEWALE AGE 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. PLOT NO. 338 LAXMI TAK, BELAGAVI-590001.

¶13

CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI

¶14

Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.19 15:36:21 +0530

¶15

SABA SAMEER DANEWALE AGE 41 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O PLOT NO 338, LAXMI TEK, BELAGAVI-590001.

¶16

SMT. SHAHEEN BASHIRAHMED DANEWALE AGE 60YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. HANUMAN NAGAR, BELAGAVI-590001.

¶17

SMT. ANURADHA @ RANI AADHINATH PATIL AGE 38 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. CAMP BELAGAVI-590001.

¶18

SHRI PARASHURAM BHARAMANI PATIL AGE 43 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.117, LAXMI GALLI,

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC-D:2303 CRL.P No. 102535 of 2021

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

SULAGA BELAGAVI-59001.

¶23

SHRI PRANAY RATNAKAR SHETTY AGE 32 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. HUDA PLOT LAXMI TEK, BELAGAVI-590001.

¶24

…PETITIONERS

¶25

(BY SRI. SHAFIAHAMAD B. SHAIK, ADVOCATE)

¶26

AND:

¶27

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS POLICE INSPECTOR, TILAKWADI PS BELAGAVI, REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD-580001.

¶28

MS. BEENA GURURAJ ACHAR AGE 47 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE R/O. FLAT NO. 101 MAGNOLIA-2, M.G.COLONY, TILAKWADI, BELAGAVI-590001.

¶29

…RESPONDENTS

¶30

(BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶31

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET FILED IN CC NO.411/2020 BY THE PSHO TILAKWADI POLICE STATION AND THE COGNIZANCE TAKEN BY THE IV TH JMFC COURT BELAGAVI ON 03.11.2020 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 143, 323, 427, 504, 506 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 7, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

¶32

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶33

¶34

NC: 2026:KHC-D:2303 CRL.P No. 102535 of 2021

¶35

HC-KAR

¶36

ORAL ORDER

¶37

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

¶38

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a

¶39

memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:

¶40

“ MEMO

¶41

HEREIN the Memo on behalf of the petitioner is as under:-

¶42

The present petition is filed to quash the charge sheet at Annexure-‘C’ filed in C.C.No.411/2020 by the Tilakwadi Police Station, Belagavi, for the offences punishable U/s. 143, 323, 427, 504, 506 R/w Section 34 of IPC.

¶43

It is submitted that, with a liberty to move, Discharge Application before the Trial Court, the top noted Criminal Petition may kindly be disposed off, to meet the ends of justice.

¶44

Placing the memo on record, petition is

¶45

dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as prayed for.

¶46

Sd/(V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶47

AC Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 1

Ms Nazaneen Gulahmed Danewale v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms Nazaneen Gulahmed Danewale v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Leetavati Alias Lilavathi Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Yallappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Baba Balasab Jamkhandi, Vs the State of Karnataka

Shri. Raghavendra S/O Dayanand Pai Vs the State of Karnataka

Allahbhakshi Alias Allabhakshi S/O Mr. Peer Sab Vs the State of Karnataka

K Manjunath S/O Hanumanthappa Vs State of Karnataka