Dismissed¶30

Smt. Meghana Alias Pallavi v. Maruti S/O Roopaleppa Nayak

Karnataka HC9 Feb 2026CRL.P/102501/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal memo; petition dismissed as infructuous; S.482 Cr.P.C. petition tagged 528 BNSS; challenge to order dated 06.05.2021 on I.A. No.1 under S.397(2) Cr.P.C. in Crl.R.P. No.15/2021, Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Gadag; revision subsequently dismissed on 18.01.2022; single judge V. Srishananda; Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench; CRL.P No. 102501 of 2021; decided 09.02.2026; no costs, no quantum.

What did the court decide?

Placing the withdrawal memo filed by learned counsel for the petitioners on record, the criminal petition is dismissed as it has rendered infructuous. ¶30

Smt. Meghana Alias Pallavi Vs Maruti S/O Roopaleppa Nayak — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC-D:1930 CRL.P No. 102501 of 2021

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD

¶5

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102501 OF 2021 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS))

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SMT. MEGHANA @ PALLAVI W/O. MARUTI NAYAK AGE 30 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK

¶11

ABHAY S/O. MARUTI NAYAK AGE 6 YEARS, OCC. NIL SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN PETITIONER NO.1 I.E., SMT.MEGHANA @ PALLAVI W/O. MARUTI NAYAK R/O. ATTIKATTI -582103 TQ. MUNDARGI DIST. GADAG NOW R/AT. C/O. K.P. RATHOD TEACHER 1ST CROSS, SHIVAPET, RON-582209 DIST. GADAG

¶12

…PETITIONERS

¶13

Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench.

¶14

(BY SRI. CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

MARUTI S/O ROOPALEPPA NAYAK AGE. 36 YEARS, OCC. HINDI TEACHER GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, RADDER-MAGANUR - 582209 TQ. NARAGUND, DIST. GADAG R/O. ATTIKATTI-582103 TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST. GADAG NOW AT NARAGUND DIST. GADAG

¶17

…RESPONDENT

¶18

(NOTICE SERVED TO RESPONDENT)

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC-D:1930 CRL.P No. 102501 of 2021

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 06.05.2021 ON IA NO.1 FILED SECTION 397 (2) OF CR.P.C. IN CRL.R.P. NO.15/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, GADAG, VIDE ANNEXURE-D, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo

¶27

for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:

¶28

“The petitioners have filed the present petitin seeking quashing of the order dated 06.05.2021 on IA No.1 filed Sec.397(2) of Cr.PC in Crl.RP No.15/2021 on the file of the Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Gadag, vide Annexure-D. The Trial Court after hearing both the parties has dismissed the Crl. RP No.15/2021 on the file of the Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Gadag by its order dated 18.01.2022. Hence, the present petition does not survive for consideration. Copy of the Daily Status of Crl. RP No.15/2021 is produced herewith for kind perusal.

¶29

Hence, this memo.”

¶30

2. Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as it has rendered infructuous .

¶31

Sd/(V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶32

CLK_CT-CMU

Smt. Meghana Alias Pallavi v. Maruti S/O Roopaleppa Nayak

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Meghana Alias Pallavi v. Maruti S/O Roopaleppa Nayak

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arif Javid Shaikh Vs the State of Karnataka

Dhanaprabha Chits Pvt. Ltd. Vs Umesh S/O. Gundopant Sangavakar

Shri Krishna Nagayya Gonda S/O Nagayya Gonda Vs the State of Karnataka

Chandrashekhar Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr. Ajay S/O Late Shri Bansh Lochan Singh Vs the State of Karnataka

Preetesh S/O. Naveenchandra Patel Vs State of Karnataka