Dismissed¶31

Divyajyothi v. State Bank of India

Karnataka HC10 Mar 2026COMAP/348/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of commercial appeal after out-of-court settlement; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; refund of Court fee and of amounts in deposit; Karnataka High Court at Bengaluru; Section 13(1A) Commercial Courts Act 2015; COM.O.S.NO.25/2021, Principal District and Session Judge, Mandya; State Bank of India Halaguru Branch; appellants Divyajyothi and Yogeshkumar.R; coram Anu Sivaraman and Tara Vitasta Ganju; decision dated 10 March 2026.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; amounts in deposit, if any, to be fully refunded to the appellants; Registry to refund the Court fee to the appellants on proper identification; pending interlocutory applications disposed of. ¶31

Divyajyothi Vs State Bank of India — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:14328-DB COMAP No. 348 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 348 OF 2023

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

DIVYAJYOTHI

¶11

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, D/O. RAJU.S,

¶12

YOGESHKUMAR.R AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O. RAJU.R,

¶13

BOTH ARE R/AT T.K.HALLI VILLAGE AND POST, HALAGURU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 430.

¶14

Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR.G.M., ADVOCATE) Location: HIGH COURT OF AND: KARNTAKA

¶15

…APPELLANTS

¶16

STATE BANK OF INDIA, HALAGURU BRANCH, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 430. REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.

¶17

…RESPONDENT

¶18

(BY SRI. B.C.GURU., ADVOCATE)

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:14328-DB COMAP No. 348 of 2023

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT HAS FILED THE ABOVE COMAP / COMMERCIAL APPEAL UNDER SECTION 13(1A) OF COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015, PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO CALL FOR RECORDS. SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04/08/2022 PASSED BY PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE AT MANDYA, IN COM.O.S.NO.25/2021 WITH ENTIRETY. PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE JUDGMENT AND DECREE OR ORDER AS THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS IT FIT TO GRANT IN THE NATURE AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE SO AS TO SECURE THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶23

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶25

& HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶26

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶27

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

¶28

The learned counsel appearing for the appellants has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal.