Disposed¶26

M/S. Nirman Sonestaa Developers v. Sri. Venkataswamy Reddy

Karnataka HC8 Sept 2026COMAP/316/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur; MFA No. 3250 of 2026 (AA); arbitration appeal under S. 37(1)(b) Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 r/w Order 43 Rule 1 CPC against S. 9 application allowed in COM A.A. No. 74/2026; conversion of MFA into commercial appeal permitted; appeal disposed of for statistical purposes; parties: M/s. Nirman Sonestaa Developers v. LRs of Venkataswamy Reddy (Rathi I.) and Vinay I.; no cases cited; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Permission to convert the miscellaneous first appeal into a commercial appeal and to file the second set with necessary rectifications in the fresh appeal; appeal disposed of for statistical purposes. ¶26

M/S. Nirman Sonestaa Developers Vs Sri. Venkataswamy Reddy — Arbitration | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:27994 MFA No. 3250 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3250 OF 2026 (AA)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

M/S. NIRMAN SONESTAA DEVELOPERS NOS. 94/2, 3 AND 4, BELLANDUR VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU BELLANDUR POST, BENGALURU - 560 037, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER B. GOVARDHANA CHARY

¶9

…APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI. SHIVARAMU H.C., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

SRI. VENKATASWAMY REDDY SINCE DECEASED REP. BY HIS LRS. SMT. RATHI I., W/O. M. INDRA KUMAR, D/O. LATE VENKATASWAMY REDDY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

¶14

SRI. VINAY I. AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O. M. INDRA KUMAR, RESIDING AT NO.272, 5^TH 'D' CROSS, 6^TH MAIN, HAL 3^RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560 075.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI. V. VISWANATH SETTY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 & C/R2)

¶17

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:27994 MFA No. 3250 of 2026

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 37(1)(b) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 R/W ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 16.03.2026 PASSED IN COM A.A. NO. 74/2026 ON THE FILE OF THE C/C LXXXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CCH-89, ALLOWING THE APPLICATION FILED U/S 9 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT.

¶20

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶22

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶23

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he

¶24

may be permitted to convert this miscellaneous first appeal into a commercial appeal.

¶25