M/S. Scenic Beauty Homes Private Limited Vs Mr.Pankaj Kumar

M/S. SCENIC BEAUTY HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED REGISTERED OFFICE AT 552, 7^TH MAIN ROAD, AGS LAYOUT, DOLLARS COLONY, R M V 2^ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 094. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, RAJKUMAR S.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. V AKSHAY KUMAR JAIN.,ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

MR.PANKAJ KUMAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O ARUN KUMAR, RESIDING AT FLAT 306, BLOCK 1, SAROVAR APARTMENT, RACHENHALLI, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.

¶16

…RESPONDENT

¶17

(V/O DATED 10.4.2026, NOTICE TO RESPONDENT H/S)

¶18

THIS CMP IS FILED UNDER 11(5) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 PRAYING TO a) APPOINT A FIT AND PROPER PERSON AS THE SOLE ARBITRATOR TO ADJUDICATE UPON THE DISPUTES AND DIFFERENCES THAT HAVE ARISEN BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE

¶19

2 -

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:23852 CMP No. 588 of 2024

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

RESPONDENT IN CLAUSE 31 OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATED 04.07.2023 EXECUTED BETWEEN BOTH THE AFORESAID PARTIES AT ANNEXURE A AND ETC.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Respondent served, remained absent.

¶27

In this petition, the petitioner has sought for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to Clause 31 of the Agreement of Construction dated 04.07.2023 (Annexure-A), in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).

¶28

Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and upon perusal of Clause 31 of the Agreement of Construction dated 04.07.2023 (Annexure-A), I am of the considered opinion that, an Arbitrator is to be appointed to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.

¶29

3 -

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:23852 CMP No. 588 of 2024

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

Accordingly, this petition under Section 11 (5) of the Act, 1996 is allowed.

¶33

Sri. S.R. Somashekhara, Retired District Judge is appointed to enter into the said reference of Arbitration and act as the Sole Arbitrator in the present case in the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre, Bengaluru, as per the Rules governing the said Arbitration Centre.

¶34

All claims and contentions of any of the parties are left/kept open to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal.

¶35

A copy of this order be sent forthwith to the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre, Khanija Bhavan, Bengaluru, for proceeding further in the matter.

¶36

Registry is directed to return all original documents produced by any of the parties if any, after obtaining Photostat copies of the same.

¶37

SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶38

HR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16

M/S. Scenic Beauty Homes Private Limited v. Mr.Pankaj Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Scenic Beauty Homes Private Limited v. Mr.Pankaj Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Anuradha Abraham Vs M/S Redifice Developers India Pvt. Ltd.

Smt. Prema Kumari @ Prema Vs Assistant Registrar of

Meena Bazaar Vs Mohammed Amin Abubaker

Rooman Technologies Private Limited Vs Karnataka State Rural Livehood

Sri Nandeesha Vs the State of Karnataka by

Belenus Institute of Nursing Sciences Vs State of Karnataka