Disposed¶36

Smt. Rathnamma v. Sri Arun R

Arbitration – Appointment of sole arbitrator

Karnataka HC14 Jul 2026CMP/408/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CMP No. 408 of 2025 (NC: 2026:KHC:35799), High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, decided 14.07.2026 by B M Shyam Prasad J. Section 11(6) arbitration petition; recall of arbitrator-appointment order upon settlement in mediation; Clause 21 arbitration clause; agreement dated 11.09.2023; legal notice dated 19.06.2025; proposed arbitrator Kukkaje Ramakrishna Bhat, Retired District Judge; petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Recall of the earlier order appointing a Former Judge as sole arbitrator, and disposal of the Section 11(6) petition, the parties having settled their dispute in mediation. ¶36

Smt. Rathnamma Vs Sri Arun R — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:35799 CMP No. 408 of 2025

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 14^TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 408 OF 2025

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE RANGANATH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,

¶9

SRI SURESH KUMAR R S/O LATE RANGANATH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

¶10

SMT. USHA K W/O SURESH KUMAR R AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

¶11

SIDDARTH S S/O SURESH KUMAR R AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS

¶12

Digitally signed by VANAMALA N

¶13

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

MASTER VISHWAS S S/O SURESH KUMAR R AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS

¶15

MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER I.E., PETITIONER NO.2

¶16

SMT. R BHAVANI D/O LATE RANGANATH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER SURESH KUMAR I.E., PETITIONER NO.2

¶17

ALL ARE RESIDING AT 4^TH CROSS, 3^RD MAIN,

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:35799 CMP No. 408 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

KOLARAMMA BADAVANE KOLAR TOWN, KOLAR - 563101

¶22

…PETITIONERS

¶23

(BY SRI. GIRISH KUMAR R.,ADVOCATE)

¶24

AND:

¶25

SRI ARUN R S/O LATE RAMANJANEYA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT 1^ST MAN ROAD GARUDACHARIPALYA WHITEFIELD ROAD BANGALORE - 560048

¶26

…RESPONDENT

¶27

(BY SRI. MURALIDARA R..,ADVOCATE)

¶28

THIS CMP IS FILED U/S. 11(6) OF ARBITRATION AND RECONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE PETITION AND APPOINT HON'BLE SHRI. KUKKAJE RAMAKRISHNA BHAT, RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE, AS SOLE ARBITRATOR, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CLAUSE 21 OF THE AGREEMENT DATED: 11.09.2023 AT ANNEXURE-A, AS REFERRED BY THE PETITIONER IN LEGAL NOTICE DATED: 19.06.2025 AT ANNEXURE-D B) ALTERNATIVELY, THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO APPOINT ANY OTHER PERSONS AS SOLE ARBITRATOR FOR ADJUDICATION OF THE DISPUTE THAT HAS ARISEN BETWEEN THE PETITIONERS AND THE RESPONDENT.

¶29

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶30

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

¶31

¶32

NC: 2026:KHC:35799 CMP No. 408 of 2025

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

ORAL ORDER

¶35

This Court, while appointing a Former Judge as a sole arbitrator, has referred the parties to the mediation and the parties have settled their dispute. The learned counsel for the petitioners makes a request for just orders in the light of the afore.

¶36

Hence, the order appointing a Former Judge of this Court is recalled and the petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶37

Sd/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE

¶38

Smt. Rathnamma v. Sri Arun R

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Rathnamma v. Sri Arun R

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Miss. Rajeswari Devi. S. v. Vs the Greater Bengaluru Authority

Mr. Mohammed Sadiq Vs the State of Karnataka

Catterpiller Financial Services India Private Limited Vs M/S Giri Constructuion

Mr. Akarsh S Vs Union of India

Kiran H R Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Thimmappa Uchangappa Vs Income Tax Officer