Dismissed

Smt Veronica S v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC18 Feb 2026CCC/1236/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil contempt petition filed alleging wilful disobedience by the accused of a High Court order directing consideration of applications. The accused filed an affidavit stating notice was issued and the matter is pending before the Special Court. The Court found no basis for initiating contempt proceedings and closed the complaint.

What did the court decide?

The complaint is closed; no contempt proceedings against the accused.

Smt Veronica S Vs State of Karnataka — Contempt of Court | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:9861-DB CCC No. 1236 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1236 OF 2025

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

Digitally signed by PRABHAKAR SWETHA KRISHNAN Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶11

SMT. VERONICA S W/O. LATE AMALANATHAN AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS PREVIOUS RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS:(AT THE TIME OF ORDER DONE) NO. 1/1, 1^ST FLOOR, 3^RD CROSS MARKHAM ROAD, ASHOKNAGAR BANGALORE-560 023 PRESENT RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS:No. 24, 4^TH CROSS, MUNIKALLAPPA GARDEN RAMASWAMY PALYA, KAMMANAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 033

¶12

…COMPLAINANT

¶13

(BY SRI PRASANNA KUMAR V., ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT (SPECIAL CELL) M.S. BUILDING DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001

¶16

…PRO FORMA RESPONDENT

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:9861-DB CCC No. 1236 of 2025

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

SRI SHANMUK D

¶21

THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY / ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNMENT UNDER SECTION 5 OF THE KARNATAKA PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENT ACT, 2004 SHANTHINAGAR BMTC BUS STOP, 2^ND FLOOR BANGALORE - 560 027

¶22

…ACCUSED

¶23

(BY SRI S.H. RAGHAVENDRA, AGA FOR R-1 & SRI VEERESH R BUDIHAL ADVOCATE FOR R-2)

¶24

THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ACCUSED NO.2 DISOBEY THE ORDER DATED 26.09.2024 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN W.P. NO.2025/2024.

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

¶26

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

¶28

ORAL ORDER

¶29

(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶30

The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging

¶31

wilful disobedience of the order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the

¶32

¶33

NC: 2026:KHC:9861-DB CCC No. 1236 of 2025

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

learned Single Judge of this Court in a batch of writ petitions, inter alia , directing the competent authority to consider the applications submitted by the writ petitioners.

¶36

The complainant alleges that the applications have not been considered.

¶37

The accused has filed an affidavit of compliance stating that a notice dated 22.01.2025 was issued to various applicants calling upon them to submit their claim applications within the prescribed period. Further, the applicants were informed that if the application is not furnished within the prescribed period, the application would be considered as per the Rules, if the Special Court issues an order for accepting the same.

¶38

The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the accused submits that the matter is pending before the Special Court and as soon as the orders are received, steps would be taken for implementing the same.

¶39

¶40

NC: 2026:KHC:9861-DB CCC No. 1236 of 2025

¶41

HC-KAR

¶42

In view of the above, we are unable to accept that any proceedings for wilful disobedience of the orders as alleged are required to be initiated against the accused.

¶43

The complaint is accordingly closed.

¶44

Sd/(VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE

¶45

Sd/(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE

¶46

KPS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11

Smt Veronica S v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Veronica S v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Narayana Swamy B a Vs Shri.Maheshwar Rao.M, IAS

United Breweries Limited Vs M/S. Phoenix Marketing

Devi Om Shakthi Temple Trust (Regd) Vs the State of Karnataka

Geetha H K Vs State of Karnataka

Sri H R Nagaraja Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Nagesh Vs State of Karnataka