Disposed¶34

Sri. Chikkaraju B v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC10 Sept 2025WPHC/93/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Habeas corpus; WPHC No. 93 of 2025; Karnataka High Court Bengaluru; Chikkaraju B v. State of Karnataka and police respondents; alleged detenue Kum.Bindhushree traced and produced in Court; detenue declared free, residing with parents; petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India closed; Hosakote police station; Bengaluru Rural district; NC: 2025:KHC:35661-DB; Anu Sivaraman and Rajesh Rai K, JJ.; decided 10 September 2025.

What did the court decide?

No coercive direction issued; the habeas corpus petition was closed after the alleged detenue was traced and produced before the Court and stated she was free and with her parents. ¶34

Sri. Chikkaraju B Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:35661-DB WPHC No. 93 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

¶8

WPHC NO. 93 OF 2025

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. CHIKKARAJU B S/O BHANGIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT KANNURALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. POONAM N, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOME REP BY SECRETARY, M.S BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001

¶16

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU -560 001

¶17

THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE HOSAKOTE CIRCLE, HOSKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 114

¶18

THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE HOSAKOTE POLICE STATION HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 114

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIYAPPA, SPP-I ALONG WITH SRI. THEJESH P, HCGP)

¶21

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

NC: 2025:KHC:35661-DB WPHC No. 93 of 2025

¶24

THIS WPHC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 4 TO PRODUCE THE KUM.BINDHUSHREE AND THEN HANDED OVER TO HER PARENTS.

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶27

and

¶28

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

¶29

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶30

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

¶31

Learned SPP submits that the alleged detenue has been

¶32

traced and is produced before the Court today. We have interacted with the alleged detenue. She submits that she is free and that she is going along with her parents and she is presently at her parent's residence.

¶33

The submission is taken on record.

¶34

The Writ Petition Habeas Corpus is accordingly

¶35

closed .

¶36

SD/(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

¶37

SD/(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

¶38

HKV/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3

Sri. Chikkaraju B v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Chikkaraju B v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Adyah Solar Energy Private Limited Vs Smt. Vyshali.M.L

Thippeshappa Dead by His Lrs Kalamma Vs the Assistant Commissioner / Land Acquisition Officer

The Assistant Executive Engineer Vs B S Umapathi

Smt Gowramma Vs Smt Susheelamma

Jayanthi Ramesh Vs Subramani

Smt. Anguri Khatun Biswas Vs the State of Karnataka