Anjinamma v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Restoration of names/katha in revenue records; mandamus to Tahsildar, Bengaluru South Taluk; grant cancellation set aside on parity; W.P.No.51054/2016 dated 12.10.2023; State's SLP (Civil) Diary No.37876/2023 rejected by Supreme Court; Deputy Commissioner's order Annexure-C; representation dated 21-12-2023 Annexure-D; Sy. No. 67 (2-21-0 and 2-5-0); Chinnakurchi Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk; Articles 226 & 227 Constitution of India; two-month compliance direction; four-week memo of appearance; Justice R Devdas; WP No. 8979 of 2025 (KLR-RES); NC: 2025:KHC:31165.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with a specific direction to the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, Bengaluru South Taluk, to restore the names of the petitioners in the revenue records as they were prior to the Assistant Commissioner's order of cancellation, the exercise to be completed within two months of receipt of a copy of the order; learned Additional Government Advocate permitted to file memo of appearance within four weeks.