Sri K R Ramachandra v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC (Bengaluru), WP No. 7895 of 2016 (LA-BDA), decided 05.06.2025 by Justice M. Nagaprasanna - writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; petitioners' counsel absent across three consecutive listings (17.04.2025, 03.06.2025, 05.06.2025). Subject matter: alleged lapse of BDA land acquisition of Sy.No.89 (1 acre 02 guntas), Valagerehalli Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, under notifications dated 19.1.1989 and 19.1.1994; plea grounded on Section 27 BDA Act r/w Section 24(2) RFCTLARR Act 2013; lapse issue left unadjudicated; citable value limited to non-prosecution dismissal practice.
What did the court decide?
As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on successive listings despite warnings recorded on 17.04.2025 and 03.06.2025, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution; the lapse question under Section 27 BDA Act r/w Section 24(2) RFCTLARR Act, 2013 was not adjudicated.