Dismissed¶33
The Karnataka Lokyukta v. Sri Ahmed Khaleel
Karnataka HCWP/7828/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Karnataka HC 24-10-2025 WP No. 7828 of 2020 (S-KSAT); petitioner Karnataka Lokyukta; respondents Ahmed Khaleel and State of Karnataka (RDPR); dismissal for non-prosecution/default — office objections and Court fee unpaid after six opportunities; KSAT Application No. 2376/2012 order dated 24.07.2018 not adjudicated; underlying order dated 19.10.2010 (Annexure-A10) not quashed; coram B M Shyam Prasad and T.M.Nadaf JJ.; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India.
What did the court decide?
Since office objections, including payment of Court fee, were not attended to despite six opportunities, the concerned party is evidently not interested in prosecuting the petition, and the petition therefore stands dismissed without adjudication of the Tribunal-related dispute. ¶33