M/S Nataraj Constructions Co. v. Hinduja Leyland Finance Limited

Karnataka HC28 Oct 2025WP/7061/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition (GM-RES) disposed of without adjudication; challenge to Commercial Court, Bengaluru order dated 27.01.2023 allowing IA.No.2 in Com.AA No.82/2023 rendered unnecessary by respondent's decision to withdraw its commercial application with liberty to approach the competent court having jurisdiction; liberty reserved; Articles 226/227 Constitution of India; Nataraj Constructions Co. v. Hinduja Leyland Finance Limited; E.S. Indiresh J.; Karnataka HC; 28.10.2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to the respondent to withdraw the Commercial Application filed before the Commercial Court, Bengaluru, and to file the same before the competent Court having jurisdiction. ¶¶31

M/S Nataraj Constructions Co. Vs Hinduja Leyland… — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:42889 WP No. 7061 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.7061 OF 2023 (GM-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

M/S NATARAJ CONSTRUCTIONS CO. A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER THE PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 79, NALANDA COMPLEX, JUDGES BUNGLOW ROAD, VASTAPUR, AHMEDABAD, GUJRAT - 380015. REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS MR NIRMALKUMAR @ NIRMALBHAI N PATEL AND MR ASHWIN N PATEL @ ASHWINIBHAI N PATEL. …PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI. SRINANDAN K., ADVOCATE)

¶10

Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

AND:

¶12

HINDUJA LEYLAND FINANCE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT, NO.1, SARDAR PATEL ROAD, GUINDY, CHENNAI - 600032.

¶13

ALSO HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT, NO. 21/1 GROUND FLOOR, JELITTA TOWERS, MISSION ROAD,

¶14

¶15

NC: 2025:KHC:42889 WP No. 7061 of 2023

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

BENGALURU 560027, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.

¶18

…RESPONDENT

¶19

(BY SRI. S.M. ANEES AHMED, ADVOCATE)

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 27.01.2023 ALLOWING IA. NO.2 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE LXXXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT), BENGALURU URBAN (CCH-89) IN COM.AA NO.82/2023 AT ANNEXURE-A.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent that, in view of the pendency of this writ petition before this Court, the respondent herein being a petitioner before the Commercial Court in Com.A.A.No.82/2023, is not able to withdraw the same.

¶25

It is further submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent that, the respondent herein has decided to

¶26

¶27

NC: 2025:KHC:42889 WP No. 7061 of 2023

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

withdraw the Commercial Application filed before the Commercial Court, Bengaluru, with liberty to file the same before the competent Court having the jurisdiction.

¶30

In that view of the matter, recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, I am of the view that, no further orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition.

¶31

Accordingly, reserving liberty as prayed for by the respondent, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶32

Sd/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶33

SAC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1

M/S Nataraj Constructions Co. v. Hinduja Leyland Finance Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Nataraj Constructions Co. v. Hinduja Leyland Finance Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mazher Sharief Vs the Karnataka State Commission

Siddartha P Shastry Vs the Special Deputy Commissioner 1

Dr Maya Marion Benjamin Vs Bank of India

M/S. S. M. Pharmaceuticals Private Limited Vs Karnataka State Drugs Logistics and

Sri Narasimha Murthy Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S Infii Solar Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Canara Bank