Dismissed¶53

Smt Rudramma v. v S Mangalesh

Karnataka HC1 Apr 2025WP/6985/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of writ petition as withdrawn on petitioner's memo dated 01.04.2025; no merits adjudicated. Keywords: Article 227 Constitution of India; writ petition against trial-court interlocutory order; order dated 05.12.2019; I.A. dated 23.01.2019; Annexure-K; O.S.No.17/2010; Principal Senior Civil Judge and C.J.M. Ramanagaram; High Court of Karnataka; NC: 2025:KHC:13531; WP No. 6985 of 2020 (GM-CPC); Justice M.I. Arun; Rudramma legal representatives; respondents including M/s Bisleri International Private Limited; advocate Gurudev Prasad K.T.

What did the court decide?

The memo dated 01.04.2025 filed by learned counsel for the petitioners praying that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn was taken on record, and the writ petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No point on the merits was adjudicated. ¶53

Smt Rudramma Vs v S Mangalesh — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:13531 WP No. 6985 of 2020

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 6985 OF 2020 (GM-CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT. RUDRAMMA W/O NARAYANAPPA

¶9

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS AGRICULTURIST

¶10

R/AT SHANUMANGALA VILLAGE

¶11

BIDADI HOBLI

¶12

RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS.

¶13

SMT. LAKSHMAMMA

¶14

W/O GANGANNA

¶15

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

¶16

Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶17

R/AT KETHOHALLI VILLAGE CHUNCHANAKUPPE POST TAVAREKERE HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.

¶18

VENKATARATHNAMMA W/O LAKSHMANA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

¶19

RAMANNA

¶20

S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

¶21

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13531 WP No. 6985 of 2020

¶22

VENKATARATHNAPPA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

¶23

THIMMAKKA W/O SUBRAMANYA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

¶24

KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶25

THAMMAIAH S/O LATE ANRAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶26

ALL ARE RESIDING AT SHANUMANGALA VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK-562 109.

¶27

…PETITIONERS

¶28

(BY SRI GURUDEV PRASAD K.T., ADVOCATE)

¶29

AND:

¶30

V.S. MANGALESH S/O SRI SHIVALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.421 12^TH MAIN ROAD RMV EXTENSION SADASHIVANAGAR BENGALURU-560 080.

¶31

SMT. BHAGYAMMA S/O LATE S.A.NEELAKANTAIAH

¶32

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:13531 WP No. 6985 of 2020

¶33

AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS

¶34

SMT. CHANDRAMMA D/O BHAGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

¶35

SRI. VENKATASWAMY S/O BHAGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS

¶36

SMT. SHANTHAMMA D/O BHAGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

¶37

SRI. SRINIVASA S/O BHAGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

¶38

SMT. VENKATA LAKSHMAMMA D/O BHAGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

¶39

SRI. JANARTHAN S/O BHAGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 8 ARE RESIDING AT NO.19/1 HANUMAPPA BUILDING KODIGEHALLI MAIN ROAD BHADRAPPA LAYOUT KODIGEHALLI BENGALURU-560 094.

¶40

M/S BISLERI INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED

¶41

4 - NC: 2025:KHC:13531 WP No. 6985 of 2020

¶42

NO.29/33, UDAYAGIRI VILLAGE DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU-560 010

¶43

REP. BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER SRI. RAGHAVENDRA RAO AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O BHAGAWANTA RAO KULAKARNI RESIDING AT NO.80 "ADAVAITH", 4^TH MAIN HOYSALANAGAR RAMAMURTHYNAGAR BENGALURU-560 016.

¶44

…RESPONDENTS

¶45

(R-2 TO R-8 ARE SERVED)

¶46

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 05.12.2019 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND C.J.M., AT RAMANAGARAM, IN O.S.NO.17/2010 ON I.A. DATED 23.01.2019 AT ANNEXURE-K., ETC.

¶47

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶48

¶49

NC: 2025:KHC:13531 WP No. 6985 of 2020

¶50

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN

¶51

ORAL ORDER

¶52

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 01.04.2025 with a prayer to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn.

¶53