Dismissed¶24

H C Girish v. Dr. H C Shivakumar

Karnataka HC6 Aug 2025WP/6277/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

None on merits; permission to withdraw granted - writ petition dismissed as withdrawn after becoming infructuous upon dismissal of O.S.No.248/2020 with costs. ¶24

H C Girish Vs Dr. H C Shivakumar — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:30462 WP No. 6277 of 2021

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 6277 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

H.C. GIRISH S/O LATE H.C. CHANNAIAH PATEL, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O H.P.C NILAYA, OPP NANJAPPA HOSPITAL, KUVEMPU ROAD, SHIMOGA - 577 201.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. VARADARAJ R. HAVALDAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

DR. H.C. SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE H.C. CHANNAIAH PATEL, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON AND AGRICULTURIST, R/O IST CROSS, JAYANAGARA, SHIMOGA - 577 201.

¶14

…RESPONDENT (BY MISS. SADHANA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. GURURAJ R, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF THE APPEAL COURT, BEING COURT OF II ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHIMOGA, INCLUDING ITS ORDER DTD 15.02.2021 PASSED IN MA NO.36/2020 VIDE ANNX-H AND THAT OF THE ORDER DTD 28.08.2020 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 IN O.S.NO.248/2020 BY THE COURT OF II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHIMOGA, VIDE ANNX-E FOR

¶15

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:30462 WP No. 6277 of 2021

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

VERIFYING THE FACTUAL CORRECTNESS AND LEGALITY OF THE SAME AND ETC.,

¶18

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

¶19

ORAL ORDER

¶20

The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the temporary injunction granted in M.A.No.36/2020 before the II Additional Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Shimoga. During the pendency of this writ petition, the suit in O.S.No.248/2020 is dismissed with costs. In view of the same, the present writ petition would become infructuous.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo

¶22

seeking permission to withdraw the petition.

¶23

Memo is taken on record.

¶24

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as

¶25

withdrawn .

¶26

Sd/(DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE