Smt. Sulochana D Kodgi v. Corporation Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court at Bengaluru; WP No. 55052 of 2016 (GM-RES); decided 17-03-2025 by Suraj Govindaraj J.; NC: 2025:KHC:10929. Petitioner Sulochana D. Kodgi v. Corporation Bank (Head Office, Mangalore) and Corporation Bank Vaderahobli Branch, Kundapura Taluk, Udupi District; also impleading Ministry of Micro Small & Medium Enterprises and RBI Banking Ombudsman. Prayer: certiorari to quash bank endorsements/letters dated 04.06.2016 (Annexure-N) and 04.07.2016 (Annexure-P); mandamus to reconsider representation dated 20.05.2016 (Annexure-J) before recovery action. Petitioner unrepresented (counsel reported deceased); respondents' memo recorded settlement under one-time settlement scheme (OTS); petition dismissed as settled out of Court; pending applications disposed. Statute referenced: Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India. No cases cited; no quantum awarded.
What did the court decide?
Accepting the submission of learned counsel for the respondents, as per the memo filed stating that the matter has been settled under the one-time settlement scheme, the petition is dismissed as settled out of Court.