K N Ramappa @ Rama Vs B v Narayanaswamy — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

K N Ramappa @ Rama Vs B v Narayanaswamy — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5132 WP No. 47598 of 2017 C/W WP No. 47597 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 47598 OF 2017 (GM-CPC)

C/W

WRIT PETITION NO. 47597 OF 2017 (GM-CPC)

IN WP No. 47598/2017

BETWEEN:

K.N.RAMAPPA @ RAMA S/O K NARAYANAPPA, SINCE DEAD BY LR’S

Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

1A. SMT.GOWRAMMA W/O LATE K.N.RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS R/AT NO.19, GOVINDAPPA ROAD SEETHARAMAIAH LAYOUT YESHWANTHAPURA BANGALORE-560 022

1B. SRI.B.R.MUNIYAPPA D/O LATE K.N.RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO.23, PATEL PILLEGOWDA LAYOUT RAMACHANDRAPURA, JALAHALLI BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE-560 013

1C. SRI.NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE K.N.RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO.435, 6^TH CROSS GOKUL 1^ST STAGE, 2^ND PHASE YESHWANTHPUR BANGALORE NORTH-560 022

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5132 WP No. 47598 of 2017 C/W WP No. 47597 of 2017

1D. SRI B.R.UDAY KUMAR S/O LATE K.N.RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT NO.157, 2^ND MAIN HAVANOOR EXTENSION NAGASANDRA BANGALORE-560 073

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. MURALI BABU M., ADVOCATE- ABSENT)

AND:

B.V.NARAYANASWAMY S/O K.N.VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,

SMT. NARAYANAMMA W/O K.N.KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,

PAPANNA S/O KHADLIPURA RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

SHANKARA S/O KHADLIPURA RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 ARE R/O ANANTHAPURA VILLAGE, KOTHAMANGALA POST, AVANI HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 131

…RESPONDENTS

(R3 & R4 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 4.10.2017 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE, KOLAR, ITINERATING AT MULBAGAL ONLY IN SO FOR AS I.A.26/2017 IN O.S.68/2012 AT ANNEXURE-G.

IN WP NO. 47597/2017

BETWEEN:

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5132 WP No. 47598 of 2017 C/W WP No. 47597 of 2017

B.K.MOHAN S/O LATE K.N. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/O ANANTHAPURA VILLAGE, KOTHAMANGALA POST, AVANI HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563 131

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI. MURALI BABU M., ADVOCATE- ABSENT)

AND:

K.RAMAPPA @ RAMA S/O K.NARAYANAPPA, DEAD BY LR’S

1A. SMT.GOWRAMMA W/O LATE K.N.RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS R/AT NO.19, GOVINDAPPA ROAD SEETHARAMAIAH LAYOUT YESHWANTHAPURA BANGALORE-560 022

1B. SRI.B.R.MUNIYAPPA D/O LATE K.N.RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO.23, PATEL PILLEGOWDA LAYOUT RAMACHANDRAPURA, JALAHALLI BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE-560 013

1C. SRI.NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE K.N.RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO.435, 6^TH CROSS GOKUL 1^ST STAGE, 2^ND PHASE YESHWANTHPUR BANGALORE NORTH-560 022

1D. SRI B.R.UDAY KUMAR S/O LATE K.N.RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT NO.157, 2^ND MAIN HAVANOOR EXTENSION

4 -

NC: 2025:KHC:5132 WP No. 47598 of 2017 C/W WP No. 47597 of 2017

NAGASANDRA BANGALORE-560 073

B.V.NARAYANASWAMY S/O K.N.VEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS

SMT.NARAYANAMMA W/O K.N.KRISHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS

PAPANNA S/O KHADLIPURA RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

SHANKARA S/O KHADLIPURA RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

THE RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 5 ARE THE R/O ANANTHAPURA VILLAGE, KOTHAMANGALA POST, AVANI HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563 131

...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. G.N.JANARDHANA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 R1 (A), R4, R5 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND PROCEEDS OF THE CASE AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED: 4.10.2017 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KOLAR, ITINERATING AT MULBAGAL ONLY IN SO FAR AS I.A.NO.25/2017 IN O.S.NO.68/2012 VIDE ANNEXURE-G.

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ‘DISMISSAL’, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

5 - NC: 2025:KHC:5132 WP No. 47598 of 2017 C/W WP No. 47597 of 2017

ORAL ORDER

On 03.02.2025 there was no representation on behalf of

the both the parties and also the order passed by this court was not complied. This court had directed the matter to be listed under the caption for ‘dismissal’ on 04.02.2025. When the matter was called out today, there is no representation on behalf of both the parties. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.

Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.

SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

TS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3