Dismissed¶2

Sri. T. Venkataramu @ T. v. Ramu v Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

Karnataka HC11 Nov 2025WP/47500/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for default; no appearance by petitioner or counsel (Ramesh R. for petitioner LRs absent) on hearing date or previous date; challenge to BBMP endorsement dated 09.10.2018 (Annexure-K) issued by respondent No.3 Assistant Revenue Officer, Gandhinagar Division; writ under Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; coram R. Nataraj J.; decision dated 11-11-2025; no substantive ruling on the endorsement.

What did the court decide?

As there was no representation for the petitioner on the hearing date nor on the previous date, the writ petition was dismissed for default. ¶2

Sri. T. Venkataramu @ T. v. Ramu Vs Bruhath… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:45881 WP No. 47500 of 2018

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 47500 OF 2018 (LB-BMP)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

1 SRI. T. VENKATARAMU @ T.V RAMU S/O LATE THAMMAIAH, AND BROTHER OF T.KRISHANMURTHY @ T.K.MURTHY AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT FLAT 'D', GROUND FLOOR, VASTHU JAYALAKSHMI BUILDING SESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU-560 020 SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR'S 1(a) SRI.V.NAGARAJA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR'S (a)(i) SMT.B.NEELAMMA W/O.V.NAGARAJA, Digitally AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS signed by SUMA Location: (a)(ii) SMT.N.SWAPNA HIGH COURT OF D/O V NAGARAJA KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS (a)(iii) SMT.N.PRIYANKA, D/O V NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, (a)(iv) SRI.N. HARSHA, S/O V. NAGARAJA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.303,

¶8

NC: 2025:KHC:45881 WP No. 47500 of 2018

¶9

¶10

HC-KAR

¶11

SRI SAI RESIDENCY, 3^RD FLOOR,

¶12

SAHAKAR NAGAR, BENGALURU -560 092.

¶13

1(b) SRI. V. BHASKAR S/O LATE T. V. RAMU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,

¶14

1(c) SRI. V. SHEKAR S/O LATE T. V. RAMU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

¶15

1(d) SRI. V. KISHORE KUMAR S/O LATE T. V. RAMU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

¶16

ALL ARE RESIDING AT FLAT D GROUND FLOOR, VASTHU JAYALAKSHMI BUILDING, SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU 560 020.

¶17

[AMENDED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 29.03.2022]

¶18

…PETITIONERS

¶19

(BY SRI. RAMESH R., ADVOCATE FOR LR'S OF DECEASED PETITIONER (ABSENT))

¶20

AND:

¶21

BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

¶22

THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, WEST DIVISION, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003.

¶23

THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER, GANDHINAGARA DIVISION, DR.T.C.M. RAYAN ROAD, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE,

¶24

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:45881 WP No. 47500 of 2018

¶25

HC-KAR

¶26

BEGNALURU-560 009.

¶27

SMT.T.SHANTHAKUMARI W/O LATE ISSAC, MAJOR, R/AT NO.240, 67^TH CROSS, V BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010

¶28

…RESPONDENTS

¶29

(BY SRI. H DEVENDRAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; SRI.R.B.SADASHIVAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 (ABSENT))

¶30

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO.¸ÀA:¸À.PÀA.C.UÁA.£À/ªÁ.96/¦.Dgï/4/18-19 DATED 09.10.2018 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 VIDE ANNEXURE-K.

¶31

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶32

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

¶33

ORAL ORDER

¶34

There is no representation for the petitioner. Even on the last

¶35

date, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner.

¶36

2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for default .