Dismissed¶24

S Sathyendraprakash v. Superindent of Police

Karnataka HC17 Jan 2025WP/46755/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 46755 of 2017 (GM-CC); writ under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India against Civil Rights Enforcement Cell officials (Superintendent of Police, Davanagere; Additional Director General of Police, Bengaluru); dismissed for non-prosecution on 17.01.2025 by Jyoti Mulimani, J.; petitioner/counsel absent on 16.01.2025 and 17.01.2025; no merits decided; relevant only as an instance of default dismissal, not citable for substantive propositions.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, the petitioner being unrepresented on 16.01.2025 and again on 17.01.2025 and apparently not interested in prosecuting the petition. ¶24

S Sathyendraprakash Vs Superindent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:1993 WP No. 46755 of 2017

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 46755 OF 2017 (GM-CC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

S. SATHYENDRAPRAKASH S/O LATE P.SUCHITHANANDA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O BETHEL NILAYA, OPP TO TULASI, KALYANA MANDIRA, HIRIYUR ROAD, HIRIYUR-577 598. CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. CHANNEGOWDA.P.S., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT CELL, NO.1389/32, 3^RD CROSS, SHIVAKUMARASWAMI BADAVANE, DAVANAGERE.

¶14

ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT CELL, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002. KARNATAKA.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI. C.JAGADISH., ADVOCATE FOR R1 &2)

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:1993 WP No. 46755 of 2017

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.

¶23

As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 16.01.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner it was ordered to be listed on 17.01.2025.

¶24

The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel for the petitioner. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶25

Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE

¶26

MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 58

S Sathyendraprakash v. Superindent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S Sathyendraprakash v. Superindent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

M/S Narayanswamy Vs Bharath Petroleum Corporation Limited (Bpcl)

Smt Mahendra Kaur Vs Sri v Babu

Sri K v Naidu Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Prashant Sholapurmath Vs Smt. Bhagyalakshmi

K E Samsuddin Vs the Joint Registrar of Co. Operative Society

Sri v Rajanna Vs Sri L P Manjunatha